I have one I believe I know what it is but not 100% sure. Hopefully all you experts will help.
Chris
I reckoned there was Avro in this, but was bemused by those extraordinarily spindly float supports.
I have found a reference to the Canadian-Vickers-built Avro 552 with the same photo, but I'm not entirely convinced - too many differences. Primarily the apparent lack of stagger, which is normally quite noticeable on the Avros.....
i have it as an Avro but the exact type? The version I have it as is "close but no cigar"
Chris
There were lots of 504's converted and modded with different styles of floats and tail units, but. somehow, I don't think this is one of those either - here's the Wikipedia site
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_552
but I think the caption is wrong - my info is that the Canadian Vickers-built machines all had the wing tanks added. And those wing struts just don't look right.
My two penn'orth. The vessel in the background looks like a spritsail barge with its bowsprit raised. To me a vessel with that rig suggests that the photo was taken either on the Thames or one of the rivers or harbours along the south-east or east coast of England. Is it not unlikely that a Canadian built aeroplane would be photographed in such a location? Furthermore the aeroplane in the photograph posted by Chris looks nothing like the Canadian Vickers Avro 552s illustrated in Skaarup's 'Canadian Warbirds of the Biplane Era - Trainers, Transports & Utility Aircraft' (see https://books.google.fr/books?id=bxF...%20552&f=false at pp 6-7)
Last edited by pomme homme; October 4th, 2015 at 05:44.
I'll give it to Lefty. It was found as an aircraft of the Canadian Air Force. Closest I found was a Avro "Wright". My library is still in storage thousands of miles away after move.
Chris
This image seems to be all over the net purporting to be a Canadian Vickers built Avro 552. It just shows what happens when one image is incorrectly captioned - particularly if that is done on wikipedia - and then it is blindly copied onto other sites. Maybe someone should edit the wikipedia entry for the Avro 552 to indicate that whatever the photo is, it ain't a 552! But as to what it is, I don't know but I'd like to!
The plot thickens, PH. The image in question purports to be from Canadian Forces expired Crown Copyright, PH....ah, well.
In the meantime, we haven't had a wee flying saucer for a while......
The Bleriot Spad 45. Not sure if it flew either?
Apparently not. After ground testing for a year, it was given up as a bad job.
I've seen many shots of these indoor expositions. Has anyone made a virtual tour of them? Where and when etc.
Chris
I have not come across a definitive site that maps out the Salon Expositions. Those photos are scattered to the wind across the net.
Here is a very curious biplane...
This, I think, is a creation of Messieurs Gastambide and Levavasseur, in around 1921. I know not its appellation.....
Wow, thought I would have had you all guessing for at least a day or two on this one. It is the G-L Number 2 Variable Camber Biplane of 1921.
Well done Mike!
There is video of it here. Ignore the 1931 Russian bit as they have it wrong. You also catch a view of the more portly Number 1 biplane at the end.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vwv5CdKh-8g
Good stuff, Kevin.. here's one that you won't find difficult, but it is an unusual view.........
Good job all finding and identifying obscure gems.
A fine point on its name: in French it is not "avion à cambrure variable* but "Avion à surface portante variable" which translates as "variable lifting surface" rather than camber.
my pedantic deux sous worth...
PS: Said "surface portante variable" in its extended state:
Bookmarks