Limiting speeds are defined in the cfg file. As nice as Accufeel might be, by far the most 'complaints' about FDEs result from incorrect Accufeel settings. Really frustrating.
Type: Posts; User: bstolle; Keyword(s):
Limiting speeds are defined in the cfg file. As nice as Accufeel might be, by far the most 'complaints' about FDEs result from incorrect Accufeel settings. Really frustrating.
Acu feel settings correct ?
Most probably it is 'rather unknown' because the never was a He217 ;)
Personally I appreciate it very much that more civil airplanes are approaching now, especially as FSX is a civil flightsim :)
Be careful when applying some of the tweaks. Applying them correctly (if at all possible) and it costs a lot of time with most of the time questionable results.
IMO there's only a single change to...
edited due to Nakis reply :)
Edgley Optica = old
Seabird Seeker = new
Doesn't that only happen if you extend the skid too early after take off ?
Funny that you mention that. During the first 'hot' take off my father noticed that the sky got really dark and he could even very faint see the stars.
As this was considered impossible in the 1940s...
Don't know. I've never looked for this 'feature' as this is much more a flightsimulator than a crashsimulator.
@ flaviossa
> At simmarket: EUR 60.81 (EUR 43.44 for each sim) 12us dollars more than pmdg 737ngx (Today currency) :icon_eek:
????
Metro III for FSX 50USD
737 NGX for FSX 70USD
No...
How's the sound ? Looks very tempting
Same here. Since IE11 copy & paste is u/s, slow SOH tc etc. Switched to Chrome and everything is back to normal :)
there's a second entry above the 'correct' one. The lower entry you are seeing is in the wrong location and actually can be deleted.
Error in the cfg file
The flap g-limit was set to 0.
Replace the first 4 lines with these (or replace the 0 with the correct values).
positive_g_limit_flaps_up= 4.4...
That's true! Looking for an alternative forum (I don't like the way Tom and a few his staff are 'managing' the forums at all) since years but haven't really found one yet, although simviation.com is...
Talking about training....new pilots had the 163 tanks only 30%-50% filled which resulted in much lower ceiling but at the same time in a much higher initial climb performance.
??????????
the new 208EX has a noticable more powerful engine.
??? The AoA tone is needed for maneuvering so every version needs to have it not only the Navy versions.
Without the various tones, maneuvering is much more difficult and of course the Milviz F-4...
The FDE (FM) has been completed more than half a year ago.
Alabeo planes are basically identical with Carenado planes but Alabeo does the systems/avionics wise less complex planes, e.g. no GPS in the Cutlass.
The Cutlass is not bad at all performance wise. She's 20kts faster than the 172, climbs better and can carry a 190lbs higher load.
Last but not least the Alabeo version has a real classic cockpit,...
2. Sorry, meant P&W
3. I've got more than 2000hrs on the Dash7 and I never taxied with all 4 props unfeathered.
4. I think you are wrong.
1. There are no speed levers in the Dash 7 (or any other PT-6 engined plane I know)
2. You never let a PT-6 powered plane (e.g. Dash7, Dash8) run at 100% RPM except during take off.
3. On the Dash7...
Looking very much forward to the Cutlass myself. This was the first 'high quality' plane I can remember and that was for FS5. Brings back a lot of memories.
Furthermore an Aztec or Navahog is much...
No sinking wheels since the first beta.