The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux. - Page 465

Thread: The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

  1. #11601
    SOH-CM-2020
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,143
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thank yoy Kevin! Any registration visinle on your DoubleEnder?
    New challenge. Not military despite tail star. Younger than pic may suggest.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails nmbah.jpg  

  2. #11602
    SOH-CM-2020
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,143
    Blog Entries
    1
    Please allow me to withdraw the previous challenge. Further research leads me to believe it is not what I thought it was.
    I happily replace the challenge with the attached new challenge. Look carefully and you may recognize parts of other aircraft.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails trbwpoda.jpg  

  3. #11603
    Quote Originally Posted by wout View Post
    Look carefully and you may recognize parts of other aircraft.

    Fascinating! We're back in the USSR, (with both photos)? Is it a combination of "Colt", "Clod" and possibly "Hare" or "Hoplite?"

    Dunno what it is, but I like it!

  4. #11604
    SOH-CM-2020
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,143
    Blog Entries
    1
    Hi Mr. Green
    You are very close. Russia it is (around 1991 so it would be Russia and not USSR). Developed by a club in the Krasnodar Region. Have seen it called Challenger and SKh-2 (CX-2 in Russian). Seems the plane was intended for agricultural work/transport and can be considered a "homebuilt". Depending on the site, designer is named as Mr. A.N. Kopeikin or as Alexander Nikolayevich (a former AF pilot, so he may have been the test pilot), Fuselage, tailboom and u/c came from a Mil Mi-2 heli (Hoplite), tailfeathers from an An-2 (Colt) and wings were either self design or came from an Let L-410 twin. Also reports on parts/components of aircraft such as the PZL-104 Wilga, Yak-18T. Engines were two 360hp M-14s (Ivchenko AI-14).

    Your turn, please!

  5. #11605
    That's very generous of you Wout - especially since I couldn't locate a name!

    So thanks, and here's the next...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails img463.jpg  

  6. #11606
    The very attractive Gweduck from the West Coast. My ideal aircraft - but the kit at $350,000 just a tad beyond my piggybank !

  7. #11607

  8. #11608
    Something different -
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails shnjt.jpg  

  9. #11609

  10. #11610
    That's it, G.

  11. #11611

  12. #11612
    SOH-CM-2023
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Chacombe, not far from Silverstone
    Age
    85
    Posts
    1,588
    Crumbs....I was way off beam.....looked Mcdonnell-ish initially!
    Keith

  13. #11613
    ..... and there was me thinking that I know that it's a jet, but beyond that ..... !

  14. #11614
    OK - time to end this one I think.

    It was another Sukhoi, the experimental T-5 with twin Tumansky engines.

    Cheers.

    OPEN HOUSE

  15. #11615
    Didn't realise it was another post, G !

    Anyway, we'll keep it rolling along - here's a rather comely utility machine - doubtless to be snapped up in minutes !
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails ccatas.jpg  

  16. #11616
    Quote Originally Posted by lefty View Post
    Didn't realise it was another post, G !
    That's OK L. I'll do a better job of introducing the next one should this be correct....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails img471.jpg  

  17. #11617
    Just what I thought - under an hour - ah well - over to G-land.....

  18. #11618
    Thanks Lefty.

    Here's the next one...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails above.JPG  

  19. #11619
    Looks like a Mig 17/19 hybrid - strange tubby fuselage - most Russian machines built like drainpipes - odd canopy too.....probably miles off-beam here....

  20. #11620
    You're on the right track Lefty. In the photo above it's just been released from a Tupolev Tu-4. Unlike the F-104 Starfighter, this really is a "missile with a man in it".

    Here it is on the ground...


  21. #11621
    SOH-CM-2020
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,143
    Blog Entries
    1
    Hi Mr. Green
    Did not recognize it on the first pic. I think this is the Aircraft K by the Raduka Design Bureau (which alledgely had ties with the MiG Design Bureau). Aircraft K was built to speed up development of what later became called Cruise Missiles and as you remarked carried a pilot. It externally resembled the KS-1 Kometa (NATO Kennel) cruise missile. Aircraft K could take of under own power or was air-launched by a Tu-4. Seems 3 were built (K-1, K2 and K-3) and engine was a RD-500 (RR Derwent development). First flight 1951.
    The Australians did a similar thing with the manned Pika version of the Jindivik (target) drone.

  22. #11622

  23. #11623
    SOH-CM-2023
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Chacombe, not far from Silverstone
    Age
    85
    Posts
    1,588
    Quote Originally Posted by wout View Post
    Hi Mr. Green

    The Australians did a similar thing with the manned Pika version of the Jindivik (target) drone.
    Wasn't air launched though. 2 built 1 still exists. Primarily built to help the development of the autopilot, from these flights it was decided not to fit a rudder, which caused us problems in later development of the Jindivik when higher banked turns were wanted.
    Keith

  24. #11624
    SOH-CM-2020
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,143
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thank you for the info on the Pila/Jindivik. Did not know that.
    Sorry, but could not find better pic of this pusher. Tail group should give away the designer.
    Bonus available for 3 of several features that make this one differ from other ones.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails narbsaa.jpg  

  25. #11625
    Here's a better pic, Walter....
    It wasn't 'roadable', it had a fibreglass cockpit, and a smaller engine ??
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails taylor2.jpg  

Members who have read this thread: 90

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •