DHC-4 Caribou - Page 5
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 117 of 117

Thread: DHC-4 Caribou

  1. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallymodeller View Post
    Same. It's such a delight to fly I can forgive a lot. I've used it on two complete Misty Moorings tours now, and it's quickly become my go-to bird. Only real crab is the lack of power above about 8000' ASL. The ceiling should be over 20,000', so something is wrong. I had to abandon a flight over Mt. Denali because I just couldn't make it higher than 10,000'.
    I got up to 22,000 ft this morning, over England. climbing out of Duxford...were you leaning as you climbed?
    Maybe icing?

  2. #102
    You can find most of my repaints for FSX/P3D in the library here on the outhouse.
    For MFS paints go to flightsim.to

  3. #103
    Ok, stupid question. I’m trying a repaint, of the Ansett-MAL caribou that was flown in PNG during the seventies.

    How do I move the registration from it’s spot on the empennage? It should be on the tail for this paint job.

  4. #104
    JanKees- your weathering is becoming really superb!

    BZ

    C

  5. #105
    Quote Originally Posted by Spook48 View Post
    Window heat would have been nice , i mean the knob is there but it aint working.

    snap02106 by Danny Best, on Flickr
    I wonder about a couple of the systems, like if they have them planned for a future update. You'd think wipers and heated windows would have been natural.

  6. #106
    second one down looks like theyre on final for a retardant run. lol.

    Quote Originally Posted by jankees View Post

  7. #107
    Quote Originally Posted by keithb77 View Post
    I got up to 22,000 ft this morning, over England. climbing out of Duxford...were you leaning as you climbed?
    Maybe icing?
    So here's what happened, after I thought about it a bit. The real plane has auto-rich and auto-lean settings on the mixture levers, as would be expected from a Stromberg-equipped R2000, and the gates are even marked as such. A/R is full forward, A/L is about 50%. What I failed to realize, and this was made worse after a lot of flying the AH DC-3 that has it (and the PMDG DC-6 that has a flight engineer), is that ORBX didn't bother to enable those particular settings. I had been flying the plane according to the POH, and was super confused as to why I was getting no altitude power.

    I tried it again today playing with the mixtures like it was a Cessna and got well into oxygen-needed range. Live and learn.

    Another thing added to the list of This Really Needs To Be Corrected along with the lack of an autopilot, the power-setting gauges, and lack of window de-icing and wipers.

    Still well worth it, though.

  8. #108
    The window heaters do work, but the switch is disabled. I just added a key mapping.

    I can’t find a command for windscreen wipers, though.

  9. #109

    How to engage auto-lean on the caribou?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rallymodeller View Post
    So here's what happened, after I thought about it a bit. The real plane has auto-rich and auto-lean settings on the mixture levers, as would be expected from a Stromberg-equipped R2000, and the gates are even marked as such. A/R is full forward, A/L is about 50%. What I failed to realize, and this was made worse after a lot of flying the AH DC-3 that has it (and the PMDG DC-6 that has a flight engineer), is that ORBX didn't bother to enable those particular settings. I had been flying the plane according to the POH, and was super confused as to why I was getting no altitude power. I tried it again today playing with the mixtures like it was a Cessna and got well into oxygen-needed range. Live and learn. Another thing added to the list of This Really Needs To Be Corrected along with the lack of an autopilot, the power-setting gauges, and lack of window de-icing and wipers. Still well worth it, though.
    Can you be a bit more explicit on how to auto-lean the caribou and at what altitude this should be done?

  10. #110
    Quote Originally Posted by Burnhaven View Post
    Can you be a bit more explicit on how to auto-lean the caribou and at what altitude this should be done?
    It doesn't have autolean, sadly. In real life AR is full-forward on the mix levers and AL is at about 50%. The mixture gates are marked as such, but the algorithm for auto-rich and auto-lean don't seem to have been implemented. I just use "automix" in the assistance tab for the Caribou.

  11. #111

    Automix

    Auto mix is probably a global change so you need to turn that off when you switch aircraft?

  12. #112
    Quote Originally Posted by Burnhaven View Post
    Auto mix is probably a global change so you need to turn that off when you switch aircraft?
    It is, and it's not a perfect solution as the mixture is always set for peak power. There's no way to lean out for fuel economy.

  13. #113
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallymodeller View Post
    It is, and it's not a perfect solution as the mixture is always set for peak power. There's no way to lean out for fuel economy.
    There is a key binding in controls that is something like "set best mixture," I'm going to see how well that does. But even with a supercharger, engines are going to produce less power at altitude. I'm beginning to think the Caribou was really built for under 10k ft.

  14. #114
    Quote Originally Posted by Burnhaven View Post
    There is a key binding in controls that is something like "set best mixture,"
    IIRC, Asobo broke that binding about a year ago (it just forced the mixture to cutoff), and I don't know that they ever fixed it.

  15. #115

    Set best mixture

    Quote Originally Posted by azflyboy View Post
    IIRC, Asobo broke that binding about a year ago (it just forced the mixture to cutoff), and I don't know that they ever fixed it.
    I did notice the mixture levers move just a bit when I set that binding. Time will tell if it's doing enough but I'm beginning to think the Caribou was designed for under 10k ft altitude, especially when operating on shorter fields.

  16. #116
    Quote Originally Posted by Burnhaven View Post
    I'm beginning to think the Caribou was designed for under 10k ft altitude, especially when operating on shorter fields.
    That's absolutely the case.

    Unlike turbine engines, piston engines don't burn appreciably less fuel at higher altitudes, so an aircraft like the Caribou would have been optimized for lower altitude performance, with altitudes above 10,000ft or so only being used for things like ferry flights (where the higher true airspeed and favorable winds would come into play) or situations where high terrain was involved.

  17. #117

    Service ceiling listed is for very specific situations

    Quote Originally Posted by azflyboy View Post
    That's absolutely the case.

    Unlike turbine engines, piston engines don't burn appreciably less fuel at higher altitudes, so an aircraft like the Caribou would have been optimized for lower altitude performance, with altitudes above 10,000ft or so only being used for things like ferry flights (where the higher true airspeed and favorable winds would come into play) or situations where high terrain was involved.
    Makes sense:

    service ceiling:
    7,560 meters (24,800 feet)

Members who have read this thread: 7

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •