PDA

View Full Version : Carenado Phenom is out!



ryanbatc
April 3rd, 2014, 13:48
http://www.carenado.com/CarSite/Portal/index.php

skyhawka4m
April 3rd, 2014, 14:41
Carenado and Alebeo sites have both crashed.


Those that bought it are saying its heavy on FPS......was looking forward to this but....might have to pass.

Sundog
April 3rd, 2014, 15:43
Just about everything from Carenado/Alabeo is too heavy for more system to run smoothly anymore. But my system is five or six years old. I definitely need an upgrade. I keep meaning to lower the texture quality some and seeing if that helps my frames. But I think I'll have to buy the Phenom anyway, and wait until I have a system that can handle it. I like to support quality work. Besides, if the frames are high due to gauges I'm sure it's something they'll fix.

Cirrus N210MS
April 3rd, 2014, 16:10
i will be geting it soon

skyhawka4m
April 3rd, 2014, 16:24
Just about everything from Carenado/Alabeo is too heavy for more system to run smoothly anymore. But my system is five or six years old. I definitely need an upgrade. I keep meaning to lower the texture quality some and seeing if that helps my frames. But I think I'll have to buy the Phenom anyway, and wait until I have a system that can handle it. I like to support quality work. Besides, if the frames are high due to gauges I'm sure it's something they'll fix.



I hear ya....I'm in the same boat. If I knew Windows 8 would run FSX with no issues....I'd do the upgrade myself.

ryanbatc
April 3rd, 2014, 17:19
Refresh your browser - I was able to get it with IE which I never use...

skyhawka4m
April 3rd, 2014, 19:39
thanks Ryan.....

https://scontent-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t31.0-8/10015085_10202742736962677_566312563_o.jpg

YoYo
April 3rd, 2014, 22:16
The firs jet of Carenado :). How FPS inside, I'm afraid G1000....

Anneke
April 4th, 2014, 00:49
FPS heavy eye candy! What does one want more :jump:

expat
April 4th, 2014, 01:23
Am disappointed they did this one and also doing the Hawker 850 XP whereas I am truly desperate for an ultra long range, intercontinental busjet like a G5/6, Global Express or Falcon 7x with all the vc and avionics trimmings - something of a long standing big hole in FSX!

However, just looking at the screenies at their web site it really looks exceptional inside and out . .

miragecy
April 4th, 2014, 02:30
Very smooth on my system and no FPS drop
Andy

ryanbatc
April 4th, 2014, 05:36
What is your system?

miragecy
April 4th, 2014, 05:59
i7 4770K @ 4.6 GHz
Asus P8Z77-V Deluxe motherboard
Asus Geforce GTX-680
16GB Corsair RAM
Samsung SSD 500GB (dedicated for FSX)

Sundog
April 4th, 2014, 09:32
Am disappointed they did this one and also doing the Hawker 850 XP whereas I am truly desperate for an ultra long range, intercontinental busjet like a G5/6, Global Express or Falcon 7x with all the vc and avionics trimmings - something of a long standing big hole in FSX!

Two of those you want are being worked on by other developers, one publicly announced.

ryanbatc
April 4th, 2014, 10:04
i7 4770K @ 4.6 GHz
Asus P8Z77-V Deluxe motherboard
Asus Geforce GTX-680
16GB Corsair RAM
Samsung SSD 500GB (dedicated for FSX)


And that's why lol.... There's a large fps drop compared to stock planes. I always compare to stock in a low scenery and no weather environment. Set FPS to unlimited and see what percentage of the stock fps you get with the phenom or other addon.

luckydog
April 4th, 2014, 14:24
Wow !!! Huge fps drop for me........I normally run in the 30's - 40's. This thing drops me down to 10 fps...........:dizzy:

GatorFlyer
April 5th, 2014, 03:42
Wow !!! Huge fps drop for me........I normally run in the 30's - 40's. This thing drops me down to 10 fps...........:dizzy:

Same here. Usually in the 40s FPS wise, can't seem to get more than 7-8 FPS with this hog, already requested a refund. Too bad, had great potential! Hopefully a SP or update will improve it...or not.

FleetingThought
April 5th, 2014, 06:08
I'm flying over ORBX NCA at 30fps, i3770k system.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ark
April 5th, 2014, 07:45
Am disappointed they did this one and also doing the Hawker 850 XP whereas I am truly desperate for an ultra long range, intercontinental busjet like a G5/6, Global Express or Falcon 7x with all the vc and avionics trimmings - something of a long standing big hole in FSX!

However, just looking at the screenies at their web site it really looks exceptional inside and out . .

Gulfstream won't allow their aircraft to be modeled in FS.

Sent from my BNTV600 using Tapatalk

dvj
April 5th, 2014, 10:52
It is a bit of a fps hog. In DX10, it will drop to 15 fps. Mostly runs around 25. Good looking aircraft. Can't seem to adjust the pitch trim, but need to read the manual.

OK, just tried in DX9. FPS 7 to 9. So it would appear this sim is optimized for DX10 and most likely P3D. It does look better in DX10 on my machine.

http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshotsv2/images/2014/04/05/BvhW7.jpg

d

skyhawka4m
April 5th, 2014, 11:56
Gulfstream won't allow their aircraft to be modeled in FS.

Sent from my BNTV600 using Tapatalk

Well as I'm sure you will note....the "Cessna" aircraft that carenado and Alebeo are doing.....have no "CESSNA" names on them. Trust me...if someone wants to do a "GULFSTREAM" they can do it and not call it one.....its being done all the time. As long as their company name isn't on it......seems to be the way its being done.

Smudge
April 5th, 2014, 18:44
Having had experience in this from a developer standpoint, it also depends on how far the company want to take it. Most companies protect their trademarks in terms of logos and branding, however some also enforce the design work, ie, any aircraft which significantly resembles their product also comes under their trademarks.

Gulfstream may have a blanket protection of not just their business logos and branding, but also the likeness of their product, ie their aircraft.

Mach3DS
April 6th, 2014, 11:59
These are taken in P3D...but you get the idea...looks essentially the same in FSX

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7025/13661109083_4c09b10a09_o.jpg

https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2907/13661085825_6f661fa7b3_o.jpg


https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7424/13661086295_e6f9e232ae_o.jpg

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7219/13661430414_93d1ddb9d0_o.jpg

anthony31
April 6th, 2014, 16:06
It is a bit of a fps hog. In DX10, it will drop to 15 fps. Mostly runs around 25. Good looking aircraft. Can't seem to adjust the pitch trim, but need to read the manual.

OK, just tried in DX9. FPS 7 to 9. So it would appear this sim is optimized for DX10 and most likely P3D. It does look better in DX10 on my machine.

http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshotsv2/images/2014/04/05/BvhW7.jpg

d

That's a nice looking glacier there in the background Mr D. Which scenery is that from if you don't mind me asking?

dvj
April 6th, 2014, 17:34
That's a nice looking glacier there in the background Mr D. Which scenery is that from if you don't mind me asking?

ORBX, Southern Alaska. Near Juneau.

d

anthony31
April 7th, 2014, 18:00
ORBX, Southern Alaska. Near Juneau.

d

Thanks D-man :)

narah
April 8th, 2014, 03:10
Very smooth on my system and no FPS drop
Andy

I have the F1 Cessna Mustang which is excellent, but heavy on frames and the Feel there Phenom 100 which is crap but good on frames. Was hoping for something in between. Is there somebody with a similar fleet composition ? Comments appreciated. Thanks

YoYo
June 11th, 2014, 16:04
See this:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wG0m7SEXTI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wG0m7SEXTI)

Nice work!

bmd
June 12th, 2014, 05:49
Hello YoYosim,

Thank for this imppressve video. It is hard to see the difference between the real and the virtual airplane. Have a good day

Benoit