PDA

View Full Version : Planes That Never Flew - America's First Jet Fighter



gray eagle
December 11th, 2013, 13:41
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3viiJ4g5G8#t=1404

CWOJackson
December 12th, 2013, 04:40
Thanks for posting! Some very interesting concepts in there; some I knew about, some I didn't.

wbuchart
December 12th, 2013, 08:33
Way cool, too bad there is not an L-133 for FS 2004 fort FSX

Skyhawk_310R
December 13th, 2013, 15:09
Holy cow! I work for Lockheed-Martin and I never knew about the L-133 jet nor the L-1000 axial flow jet engine! What a terrible blunder and lack of imagination by the USAAF to reject out of hand both of those pieces of aviation technology! In looking at the shape of the airfoils I have some doubts it could really have been supersonic, but I have no doubt it would have been superior to the P-80 Shooting Star and any other jet that actually flew during World War II! It might well have been equivalent to the F-86 Sabre. The L-133 could well have been pressed into service had the Luftwaffe forged ahead with their revolutionary Me-262 and had it in large numbers prior to the Normandy invasion.

Of the two items that were never fielded, I think the engine was the concept that just should have been put into production. I actually think it would have improved the performance of the P-80 to the point where it could have held its own, if not defeated, the MiG-15's in Korea. The P-80's prime problem was inadequate thrust-to-weight ratio and that axial flow engine would have solved that problem.

It is ironic that the prime Achilles Heel for the P-38 in the ETO was the turbosupercharger's bad performance due to the cold weather. In the warmer weather in the Pacific, the P-38 feasted. Yet, that turbosupercharger was designed by the same man who designed that leap ahead engine. With the superior quality control and metallurgical technology in the American aviation industry during the 1940's (and horribly compromised in Germany due to a myriad of factors war related) I have little doubt that engine could have been fielded in 1944 with superior performance of the Jumo axial flow jet engines and with vastly better reliability. Perhaps also, it could have overcome the design flaw of the Jumo engine that required the pilots to advance and retard throttles at a very slow rate or else suffer engine stall.

Thank you very much for linking that video. I thoroughly enjoyed watching it and found it very informative!

Ken