PRB
July 20th, 2009, 14:34
So evidently early model B-24s had a fuel system in which all four engines drew fuel from individual sumps located inside one center tank. All the other tanks fed into this central feed tank. Further, there was insufficient baffling inside this tank such that if you were very low on fuel, and tried to make a tight turn, the “up-wing” engines would soon be staved for fuel and quit. On at least one occasion, this design flaw, and several other contributing factors, resulted in a very bad ending to a long flight. RAF Ferry Command used converted B-24s to transport ferry crews from Europe back to Canada during WW-II. On one such flight, in February 1943, from Prestwick, UK, to Gander, Newfoundland, the ship and crew encountered severe head winds and arrived over Gander very low on fuel. Then Gander turned out to be socked in by weather, but they didn’t have fuel to make their alternate, so they were committed to Gander, which reported 200 foot ceiling, visibility 1 mile. They made for runway 27, which had a radio-range system setup for instrument approaches, but the airport crew turned the lights up on the other runway, 5/23, by mistake, assuming the Liberator would be landing into the wind, which would have been 5/23. So, they didn’t get a visual on runway 27 until they were on top of it and had to go around… Half way around, the “up-wing” engines died. The big Lib went in. One survivor.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
(North Atlantic Cat, by Don McVicar)
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
(North Atlantic Cat, by Don McVicar)