Lazerbrainz2k3
March 27th, 2009, 12:25
... to "One World Trade Center."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29913195/?GT1=43001
I'm none to pleased about some communist Chinese conglomerate getting first dibs on the building, but as for the name I don't have any concerns. It'll be great to have 1 World Trade Center as an address in NYC again - something only made better by having a squarer design featuring a matching second tower right next door called 2 World Trade Center. I guess I'm not going to get that, though.
Now, if they'd stop worrying about the name and get to building the thing, that would be much appreciated. WTC7 went back up in 4 years, and near here in Philly the taller Comcast building is finished, too, so the sooner they resolve all their stupid issues up there we can get ourselves the building finally, after all this time.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29913195/?GT1=43001
I'm none to pleased about some communist Chinese conglomerate getting first dibs on the building, but as for the name I don't have any concerns. It'll be great to have 1 World Trade Center as an address in NYC again - something only made better by having a squarer design featuring a matching second tower right next door called 2 World Trade Center. I guess I'm not going to get that, though.
Now, if they'd stop worrying about the name and get to building the thing, that would be much appreciated. WTC7 went back up in 4 years, and near here in Philly the taller Comcast building is finished, too, so the sooner they resolve all their stupid issues up there we can get ourselves the building finally, after all this time.