Hi I need help with determinate a damage of big battleships
Stuart set his Rechelieu with belt 60000 and deck 55000 (I think it go better with 63000/65000 of belt and 53000 deck) but I'm not sure
VN Iowa I was setting with belt 70000 and deck 55000, it has 310mm but has better armor in angle, and compartiment tHan south Dakota.
Usio Yamato has belt 100000 and deck 50000, I think it go better with 90000 and 60000
Vn Bismark was setting similar tHan Iowa so Belt 70000 and deck 50000, It is ok, Bismark sopported a fire of 400mm cannons of the rodney and a talboy his sister.
King George V belt 70000? deck 50000?.I found me more vulnerable in spite of his great shield was lost with Bismark and sunk by japans bombardiers relatively easy.It was a Little more bigger than Northcarolina class.
Victorio Venetto belt 65000? deck 51000
Nelson, I found me more vulnerable, it has more armor than others models than they has better structure predisposition, for example Bismark, Bismark has best structure predisposition for his armor cal.
opinions?, what about the other of the list?.
Class Belt Deck Yamato 410 mm (16 in) 230mm Iowa 310 mm (12.1) 190 mm (7.5 in) Bismark 320 mm (13 in) 120mm Rechelieu 343 mm 170 mm Victorio Venetto 350mm 161mm King George V 370 mm (14.7 inches) 152 mm (6 inches ) Nelson 356mm (4 in) 171 mm (6,75") South Dakota 310 mm (12.1) 147 - 154 mm
This page in Spanish speaking about the effectiveness of the shielding.
http://www.historialago.com/av_0425_blindaje.htm
Bookmarks