Forrestal Class Carrier - Page 3
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 85

Thread: Forrestal Class Carrier

  1. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by gray eagle View Post
    Why all the negative attitude (Bah Humbug) towards CAG aircraft. It adds some ambiance and a realism effect to it all.
    Because it's much more work for the modeler and opens yet another can of worms. ("That CAG composition is incorrect!" "I want a configuration from cruise xy!" "Why no separate landing and takeoff configurations?", etc blah blah...)

    FYI, I was there in July 1967 and witnessed USS Zippo burn, her "bugs and turkeys" burned too. I was on the USS Bon Homme Richard when we had just loaded/launched the last sortie to North Viet-Nam to conclude our nine month cruise. Suddenly, we start chugging full steam toward the FID to assist here. She was to be our relief but "Big Navy" had to find another carrier to relieve us so we could go home to the USA to be with our families. Ironically, The USS Zippo was the last ship (Sea duty) I was assigned to.
    Must've been a sight to behold. How much longer did you have to stay on station to make up for the unavailable carrier?

    No Bugs and Turkeys on deck at that time. Probably mostly Rhinos, Scooters and Whales. (With the odd whatevertheRA-5wascalled thrown in.)

  2. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by Bjoern View Post
    Because it's much more work for the modeler and opens yet another can of worms. ("That CAG composition is incorrect!" "I want a configuration from cruise xy!" "Why no separate landing and takeoff configurations?", etc blah blah...)



    Must've been a sight to behold. How much longer did you have to stay on station to make up for the unavailable carrier?

    No Bugs and Turkeys on deck at that time. Probably mostly Rhinos, Scooters and Whales. (With the odd whatevertheRA-5wascalled thrown in.)
    Since I was unfamiliar with the terms "USS Zippo" and "FID" i did a wiki search on the Forrestal. The wikipedia entry for CV-59 is very interesting reading. its too bad this carrier wasnt preserved as a museum or at least, like Oriskany, made into a reef, though I see both were considered or attempted unsuccessfully.

  3. #53
    I would like to do some deck configurations on each ship. If anything, just generic period-era aircraft. Finding low poly models to use would be my only hurdle. Again, perhaps Gary can let me have access to his statics. Modeling a ship was a pain in the ass enough. I cannot fathom the work it takes to model a plane.

    I am glad that folks are enjoying my work.

  4. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by ejoiner View Post
    Since I was unfamiliar with the terms "USS Zippo" and "FID" i did a wiki search on the Forrestal. The wikipedia entry for CV-59 is very interesting reading. its too bad this carrier wasnt preserved as a museum or at least, like Oriskany, made into a reef, though I see both were considered or attempted unsuccessfully.
    The ship was affectionately called "The FID", because James Forrestal was the first ever Secretary of Defense, FID standing for "First In Defense". This is also the slogan on the ship's insignia and patch. She was also informally known in the fleet as the "USS Zippo" and "Forest Fire" or "Firestal" because of a number of highly publicized fires on board, most notably a 1967 incident in which 134 sailors died and an additional 161 were injured.




    The term FID used for the Forrestal was also coined to mean First in Drugs; I remember there being a serious drug issue when I was there.
    The ships security teams (Master at Arms) used drug sniffing dogs thru out the ship, especially in the berthing compartments.
    When the ship was anchored at various ports of call, I remember taking a returning liberty boat and would have to climb ladders rigged from the fantail section.
    There at the base of the ladder well were trash cans (last chance) for those to dispose of illegal drugs. That idea proved to be worthless as it did not stop
    the drug issue. FYI, all the ladders on the ship were inclined at 68 degrees.

  5. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by WombRaider78 View Post
    I would like to do some deck configurations on each ship. If anything, just generic period-era aircraft. Finding low poly models to use would be my only hurdle. Again, perhaps Gary can let me have access to his statics. Modeling a ship was a pain in the ass enough. I cannot fathom the work it takes to model a plane.

    I am glad that folks are enjoying my work.
    I know I am, and really appreciate what you do.

    What ever period aircraft you decide to use will be appreciated. Naturally, I hope you decide to put a few aircraft from the 79-81 era.

    I can always "Borrow" the helo (SH-3) that is used with the Big E (Plane guard) and marry that up with the FID.

  6. #56

    Plane guard on the FID

    At last, a little "Company" on the FID.





  7. #57
    Quote Originally Posted by gray eagle View Post
    At last, a little "Company" on the FID.
    Nice shots.

  8. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by WombRaider78 View Post
    I would like to do some deck configurations on each ship. If anything, just generic period-era aircraft. Finding low poly models to use would be my only hurdle. Again, perhaps Gary can let me have access to his statics. Modeling a ship was a pain in the ass enough. I cannot fathom the work it takes to model a plane.
    Search on Flightsim for "Guy Diotte". I've found a SLUF (A-7), Hump Scooter (Late A-4), Hoover (S-3B), Sterile Arrow (EA-6) and a Rhino (F-4). Put those you want in a .bgl library and attach them to the deck like you did with the default vehicles.
    Might need a bit of paint to reflect the proper operator, but you can leave that to those who want their deck crowded.



    Quote Originally Posted by gray eagle View Post
    The term FID used for the Forrestal was also coined to mean First in Drugs; I remember there being a serious drug issue when I was there.
    The ships security teams (Master at Arms) used drug sniffing dogs thru out the ship, especially in the berthing compartments.
    When the ship was anchored at various ports of call, I remember taking a returning liberty boat and would have to climb ladders rigged from the fantail section.
    There at the base of the ladder well were trash cans (last chance) for those to dispose of illegal drugs. That idea proved to be worthless as it did not stop
    the drug issue. FYI, all the ladders on the ship were inclined at 68 degrees.
    So what was the drug of the day back then? Opium and MJ?

  9. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by WombRaider78 View Post
    Perhaps Gary could modify my package, or allow me to "borrow" his statics from his awesome Midway carrier.
    Catching up on some of the threads here and noticed this request. I'm working on an RN vessel at the moment (posting pics on flying stations), and a revamped Essex class so I probably don't have time to modify your carrier....besides you're doing a cracking job.

    Providing statics however...no problem. Happy to package up my Tilly crane and flight deck tractors for you to use. Can also pass you the F-4 and A-7. Tried to optimise the aircraft as best as I can but they are frame rate heavy when added in large numbers so I would advise experimenting with deck configurations.

    I'm currently working away from home at the moment so I haven't got access to the files. Drop me a PM to let me know where you want the statics sent and if you're okay with the wait I'll send them this weekend.

    Do you want the statics in .skp format so you can add them to the build?

    All the Best
    Gary

  10. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by gp183601 View Post
    Catching up on some of the threads here and noticed this request. I'm working on an RN vessel at the moment (posting pics on flying stations), and a revamped Essex class so I probably don't have time to modify your carrier....besides you're doing a cracking job.

    Providing statics however...no problem. Happy to package up my Tilly crane and flight deck tractors for you to use. Can also pass you the F-4 and A-7. Tried to optimise the aircraft as best as I can but they are frame rate heavy when added in large numbers so I would advise experimenting with deck configurations.

    I'm currently working away from home at the moment so I haven't got access to the files. Drop me a PM to let me know where you want the statics sent and if you're okay with the wait I'll send them this weekend.

    Do you want the statics in .skp format so you can add them to the build?

    All the Best
    Gary
    That would be awesome Gary. I can take the .skp for the statics. I will PM you this weekend.

    Thanks
    Raider

  11. #61

    Cool

    I took a little time to recently paint the statics for Gary's Midway aircraft - VF-151 (F-4's), VA-93 (A-7) and VA-115 (A-6). I'd be happy to provide in the skins section with Gary's permission and if there is interest. For the Forrestal (series), I'd be happy to take that on as well, though it would take some time for four carriers. Wondering where low poly Tomcat statics can be found, so that both a 60's-70's era Air Wing as well as an 80's-90's Air Wing could be configured, depending on what the user would be flying at the time (kind of like the Enterprise with both and 80's and 90's Air Wing).

    Final points - Thanks so much for expanding the fleet! Some day - America and JFK, and hopefully expanded Oriskany's to inlcude Hancock, Tico, and Bonnie Dick.
    First screenie (yeah i know, no Tomcats on Midway...) shows VA-93 and VF-151, second one shows VA-115.
    Cheers, Deke
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails fsx 2015-03-11 18-08-08-12.jpg   fsx 2015-03-11 18-08-47-84.jpg   fsx 2015-03-11 18-11-16-56.jpg  

  12. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by navy81 View Post
    For the Forrestal (series), I'd be happy to take that on as well, though it would take some time for four carriers. Wondering where low poly Tomcat statics can be found, so that both a 60's-70's era Air Wing as well as an 80's-90's Air Wing could be configured, depending on what the user would be flying at the time (kind of like the Enterprise with both and 80's and 90's Air Wing).
    I'd be for that Navy81; Offer something similar like the Big "E" offers, 80's 90's era air wing. For the 80's; I'd like to see CVW-17 AirWing.

  13. #63
    SOH-CM-2024 Mickey D's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Central reservation of the M62 in God's Own County.
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
    Yup.. it's certainly nice to have the option. Much depends on the deck models though. The Flying Stations Ark Royal IV (for example) only has a parked deck option in FSX (it had both in FS9). Sadly.. the poor girl shows her age now but would look less dated if the parked aircraft were gone. This goes for land based statics too. Models without ground shadows look so naff these days but folk still shove them out. Looking at screenies of SDB's latest release (Whiteman AFB), there are a lot of these in evidence. It just doesn't work for me

    Anyhoo.. yup.. having a choice is desirable but if the only choice is with parked models.. having none at all is often better

    ATB
    DaveB
    As I'm sure you know static shadows are switched on/off in the sim Dave. That goes for ALL ours too. IIRC I took the screenies on my old system and the sim runs faster without shadows. Just forgot to switch them on for the shots that's all. Just to put the record straight
    MickeyD

  14. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by navy81 View Post
    I took a little time to recently paint the statics for Gary's Midway aircraft - VF-151 (F-4's), VA-93 (A-7) and VA-115 (A-6). I'd be happy to provide in the skins section with Gary's permission and if there is interest.
    Hay Deke,

    I really don't enjoy doing textures so I was hoping someone would pick this up! I've got no issues with it so feel free to paint and share away!

    Cheers
    Gary

  15. #65
    SOH-CM-2017 DaveB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Pelsall, West Midlands
    Age
    67
    Posts
    3,533
    Yo MD

    Actually.. that isn't the case and certainly not with the Ark Royal IV's deck models (and others). I load up Ark and the models have no shadows. I load up Victorious and the models have shadows. There's a function/option in SAMM2 when saving a model to save it with or without ground shadows. I'm not talking about scenery casting shadows. Cast your peepers back at Gary Summons original FSX VFR Airfields series. His statics here were much like the old FS9 versions (eg shadowless). Check out the latest versions (with the advent of Vol1 v2) and many of the statics have been remade with ground shadows. I never use the scenery cast shadows option as by and large, I think it looks naff but each to their own

    EDIT: To make it a little clearer.. here's a shot of what I mean. The Cub has yet to have a make-over and you can see how odd it looks shoved in with the models that have ground shadows built-in



    ATB
    DaveB
    Last edited by DaveB; March 12th, 2015 at 14:16. Reason: Added screenshot

  16. #66
    The deck eye candy on the Big-E do have shadows. Same with the original FS9 version. If we were to do an NAS scenery using those aircraft again they would have shadows as well -- it is built in to the model. Might look weird if there was a mix of them and AI's not casting shadows though.

  17. #67
    SOH-CM-2017 DaveB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Pelsall, West Midlands
    Age
    67
    Posts
    3,533
    Cheers Frank.. we crossed in the post. MD is obviously more confused than previously thought

    ATB
    DaveB

  18. #68
    Still looking forward to using Gary's statics and tilly on my ships.

    Anticipating the planes, I added specular mapping to the ships. The result turned out great, and will be included in the update with the static aircraft.


    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Zippo.jpg  

  19. #69
    Charter Member 2015 delta_lima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3,438
    Blog Entries
    1
    A small request, with all this talk about statics:

    While the majority would prefer some statics, I'm wondering if there could be even one hull number (doesn't matter which) with a "clean" deck. By that, the Tilly crane, but no a/c. That enables the carrier for use in either CARQUAL - where there were few birds on deck, and/or a much earlier angled deck period, (Cuban Missile Crisis era, etc).

    No biggie if can't be done - but that would be most excellent if possible.

    Kind regards,

    dl

  20. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by delta_lima View Post
    A small request, with all this talk about statics:

    While the majority would prefer some statics, I'm wondering if there could be even one hull number (doesn't matter which) with a "clean" deck. By that, the Tilly crane, but no a/c. That enables the carrier for use in either CARQUAL - where there were few birds on deck, and/or a much earlier angled deck period, (Cuban Missile Crisis era, etc).

    No biggie if can't be done - but that would be most excellent if possible.

    Kind regards,

    dl
    I was planning on having clear decks too.

  21. #71
    I was planning on having clear decks too.
    Super! Thanks.
    Striker, listen, and you listen close: flying a plane is no different than riding a bicycle, just a lot harder to put baseball cards in the spokes.

  22. #72
    Charter Member 2015 delta_lima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3,438
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by expat View Post
    Super! Thanks.
    +1 - great news.

    dl

  23. #73
    SOH-CM-2024 Mickey D's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Central reservation of the M62 in God's Own County.
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
    Cheers Frank.. we crossed in the post. MD is obviously more confused than previously thought

    ATB
    DaveB
    Not confused at all Dave. You referred to the Whiteman screenies and so did I. The Big E deck candy have built in shadows. Different beastie.
    MickeyD

  24. #74
    SOH-CM-2017 DaveB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Pelsall, West Midlands
    Age
    67
    Posts
    3,533
    Have you missed the point or have I MD?? Your statics in the Whiteman scenery don't have ground shadows.. they'd look better if they did.. without having to resort to scenery casting shadows. I illustrated this with my screenie

    ATB
    DaveB

  25. #75

    A little glimpse of things to come...

    Gary graciously sent me his A-7, F-4, Tractor, and Tilly crane. I tooled around with ways to attach them to the ships. I also added some specular texture to the static models. I found an A-6 from another freeware 3D download site. It is really low poly, and VERY frame friendly. I folded the wings and added the landing gear today.

    Here is a good shot of some statics on the deck.




    Thanks Gary for lending me the statics.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Zippo2.jpg  

Members who have read this thread: 6

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •