The Stark Difference in DSLR vs Mirrorless Camera Expansion

[Panther_99FS]

http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014.../#.VIUcl7Du3IU

[jmig]

I have a Nikon V3. The mirroless still have a ways to go to catch up with the DSLR.

[ViperPilot2]

I just purchased a secondhand Nikon D40 DSLR a couple of months ago, and I'm having quite a bit of fun with it! While it may not have all of the features the 'newest and greatest' dSLR's have, I think the D40 has everything I need to re-discover making photos with one. The price wasn't too bad, either!

[Panther_99FS]

I have a Nikon V3. The mirroless still have a ways to go to catch up with the DSLR.

jmig,
Check this out!
-> http://www.photographerslounge.org/s...ad.php?t=32894

[jmig]

I just purchased a secondhand Nikon D40 DSLR a couple of months ago, and I'm having quite a bit of fun with it! While it may not have all of the features the 'newest and greatest' dSLR's have, I think the D40 has everything I need to re-discover making photos with one. The price wasn't too bad, either!

The D-40 was the first DSLR I purchased. It is a nice camera. The granddaddy of the D-3300.

[jmig]

jmig,
Check this out!
-> http://www.photographerslounge.org/s...ad.php?t=32894

Nice shots P. I really like the sixth one down. Santa's helper.

The V-3 is a really great travel camera. It works well in good light. I can shoot at 10 frames a sec or even 60, if I go electronic shutter. I have the 70-300 lens and find that with wildlife it hasn't given me the results for which I was hoping. In low light pushing 1600-3200 ISO fine feathers show up as dots more than feathers. You can get rid of the noise but you can't bring the detail and DR back.

As a travel camera, two lenses. a 6.7 to 12 and a 10-100 gives me the equilivant range of 18-270mm not bad for such a small package. As long as I can keep the ISO below 800, I defy you to tell the difference in picture IQ from a full frame DSLR. It is that good.