Fsx?

[Raider17]

Hello all,
Just joined Sim Outhouse and had a look around. PArdon my ignorance, but I am unfamiliar with some flightsims out today so can someone bring me up to speed with FSX please? I have always wondered if there were any flightsims which covered jet aircraft/naval aviation, and as I have just seen one of my fave aircraft (F14) here my mind is boggling at the thought of flying one in a sim .
Any pointers would be gratefully received

Thanks

JC

[piperarcherpilot]

Just a small pointer - if you want Naval Aviation, you want to get a version of FSX that includes the Acceleration Expansion Pack - right now, the FSX Gold Edition is your best bet. Here it is on Amazon.com

http://www.amazon.com/Flight-Sim-X-G...5795404&sr=8-1

It comes with missions and tutorials to get you up to speed with Carrier Ops.

Dino's F14 thats causing all the buzz here is a GREAT addon. Its free, too!

[piperarcherpilot]

Also, for a decent and value priced flight controller, I recommend the Saitek Aviator. It has lots of programmable switches and what I really like, the dual throttle control. Makes operating twin engined planes a lot more realistic.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000I62PEK

[Raider17]

Thanks for that!

JC

[Raider17]

I take it that FSX is more of a flying simulation than a shoot-em up, yes?
If so it could be a bit too deep for me,...I probably would`nt get off the deck!

JC

[piperarcherpilot]

Yes, its not weapons based. Its primarily a civilian flight simulator.

I dont know of any modern Naval Sims, but if you want more of a combat sim with an 'easy' mode (with room to grow and learn systems and such) I suggest 'Lock On'.

http://www.amazon.com/Lock-Modern-Ai.../dp/B000066641

I dont know why its so much money at Amazon...you might want to try Best Buy - they may have some still in stock.

[Navy Chief]

Welcome to SOH, Raider17. Great bunch of folks here, and very knowledgeable about flight sims.

Navy Chief

[MCDesigns]

I take it that FSX is more of a flying simulation than a shoot-em up, yes?
If so it could be a bit too deep for me,...I probably would`nt get off the deck!

JC

Welcome JC, hope you stick around.

As for FSX being to deep, it's easier to get into than say LockOn which is a more complicated shooting sim. FSX is scalable and can be easy or hard, depending on what you like.
if you are into Naval aviation, FSX really shines in that dept.

We also have forums for X-plane, FS9 (before FSX), and most combat flightsims worth checking out.

[piperarcherpilot]

As for FSX being to deep, it's easier to get into than say LockOn which is a more complicated shooting sim. FSX is scalable and can be easy or hard, depending on what you like.
if you are into Naval aviation, FSX really shines in that dept.

True. A good point...I had forgotten how un-user friendly some of LockOn can be to a beginner...FSX is a much better introduction.

[Brett_Henderson]

On the enthusiastic side, don't worry about getting off the deck. You'll have your hands full (in a fun way), learning the basics in a C172.. working your way up the ladder to multi-engine and jets.

If you jump right in , trying to land a modern fighter on an aircraft carrier.. you'll be about as succesful as you'd be if you tried that for real.

Along the way (if you choose), you can learn a WHOLE bunch of stuff that will net you genuine piloting skill.

On the realistic side.. be aware that FSX requires a pretty stout computer.. Maybe you could post your specs, and we'll go from there

[heywooood]

yeah - computer power is the key to enjoying FSX.

the more power your rig has - the more you can open FSX toward its full glory...and its got some glory to it.

post your specs here before you buy the game - or - download the FSX demo from FSinsider to see how that plays on your current rig.

if the demo looks good then the Gold Edition should run pretty well because the sim has been tuned since the demo was made.

[Navy Chief]

I remember well the very first time I landed successfully in a flight sim. It was a Phantom in Strike Fighters Project One, just after it first was released....way, way back. It was definitely a feeling of "achievement", being able to put that aircraft on the runway, without crashing.

NC

[Brett_Henderson]

Loading a couple of virtual buddies, and their luggage (actually doing it at the loading screen).. and then setting your fuel load to what you can carry with those buddies and bags aboard.. for the first leg of your multi-fuel stop adventure.. double-checking weather (at a real avaitaion weather site, because your running real weather), to make sure winds aloft won't leave you running short of fuel.. printing out any approach plates you might need.. and re-checking your nav-log (where you've planned the whole flight as though it were real), to make sure all the Com and Nav frequencies are correct... makes firing up that Cessna 172 pretty thrilling.

When the last leg ends having you shoot an instrument approach (darn that 1 mile visibility), as published.. looking up over the panel at decision-height.. to see a glorious runway, right where it's supposed to be; is almost as satisfying in the sim, as it is for real



Googling about the airport and town where you've just landed, for some virtual tourism, is a nice bonus

[harleyman]

Hello and welcome...

All the info above is spot on...FSX / Acceleration is what you're after...BUT


I also agree that the first thing to do is post you computer specs..

[Panther_99FS]

Welcome to the greatest warbird flight sim website around!