FSD F-23 at dusk

[tigisfat]

I gotta slow down, but right now I can't resist. I'm the most critical person on the planet, and I've got a keen eye for detail. It's almost like I was born to beta test. I can't find anything really wrong with this aircraft that FSD isn't already working.....

[gajit]

Perhaps you would ask them to get on with the MU2 and Jetstar that we have been waiting for years and years and years and years and years for!!!

Great shots BTW

[Naismith]

That is one ugly aeroplane, it has no twirly things that make it fly, nor has it any strings holding the wings together.

[mad52]

I gotta slow down, but right now I can't resist.

More fun :-)



Congrats to Javier Fernandez for his magnificent USS Nimitz, and also to Lamont Clark for his elegant AICarriers2 !

[6297J]

That is one ugly aeroplane, it has no twirly things that make it fly, nor has it any strings holding the wings together.

Nice shots but I agree, ugly as sin

Seems to me FSD are trying to drum up interest and kick start their business again with a celebrity aircraft when they should either finish or publicly abandon the projects they have been teasing us with since the early years of FS2004!!

[Quixoticish]

I'm not complaining, I had no real interest in any previous FSD releases but this one will certainly make me part with my hard earned pennies.

I also think the YF-23 was much better looking than the YF-22.

[Kavehpd]

No bump maps?

[MudMarine]

Ugly........? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think she's one bad ass machine! I bet just the mear sight of that ugly brick puts fear in the enemy! I don't like shop heaters very much but this one is sweet!

[Chuck_Jodry-VJPL]

The bumps are as good as it gets....

As to the FlightSim Developers product line , with the revamping of the personnel and its fresh approach to previously
built products and quality it was decided to rebuild the Jetstar from scratch.
The "Old" one sitting on my hard drive is a Gmax model , produced from the 2004 SDK for use with FS9 it like the MU-2 , Seneca
and Navajo were low poly models by today’s standards, they also cannot make use of texture baking and take advantage of a wealth
of tools available to me using 3DS9.

These "old" models are flying in my sim and are more or less complete, but they are not up to the standards that currently apply to FSX productions where 300,000 poly models are becoming the norm and fully baked interiors are expected, in short they are "history" , within
today’s marketplace 65,000 poly models are not Cutting Edge, the FlightSim Developers product line will from now on be on the Cutting Edge.

[6297J]

Ugly........? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think she's one bad ass machine! I bet just the mear sight of that ugly brick puts fear in the enemy! I don't like shop heaters very much but this one is sweet!

I shall call her Ugly Betty.

An 'interesting' thing, a bit of a head turner if for all the wrong reasons, possibly an exciting gal to take out for a quick spin once in a while.

But you'd be too embarrassed to introduce her to your freinds

[VFR Reviews]

Absolutely BEAUTIFUL stuff :D

[gajit]

As a MILVIS model its bound to be good so I'll get it anyway - even though it is not the best looking bird i have ever.........

[SolarEagle]

The bumps are as good as it gets....

Black textures are hard to make look right, and that shot of the bump maps shows the best rendition of a black aircraft that I have ever seen.

[MudMarine]

OK.........release the bugger!! It looks ready to me!!

[Gibbage]

Also, honestly, stealth jets are not all that bumpy Sort of kills the "stealth" part. Heh.

Sorry. I could not resist.