Sim-Outhouse's Interest in the RTRW - Page 3
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 61 of 61

Thread: Sim-Outhouse's Interest in the RTRW

  1. #51
    Roger on having teamspeak. Last year it was giving me problems running the sim, so I did not use it this year. Ideally running it on a second computer, but I don't have that.

  2. #52
    [QUOTE=srgalahad;1009766]
    Quote Originally Posted by MaddogK View Post
    I wouldn't be a bit ashamed about a 2nd place showing, [./QUOTE]

    Let me put that 2nd (unofficially) place in perspective.

    The Elapsed time difference between us and AvSim was 3 hrs 13 minutes. There are three parts to this:

    Routing: Because of choices AvSim was faster between Newfoundland and Croatia (CYYR/CCE4) and LDRO by 1+05.
    Martin is sitting in a hotel in Japan muttering "if I'd only seen that..." and we discussed it during the race. However, if there had been 4 or five or ten people testing plans instead of one or two, it might well have been noticed. Planners need not be flyers, either, but they seem scarce.

    Penalties, etc. We incurred penalties and "wait time", reduced by the few bonuses we could earn with a pilot shortage to the net amount of 1+07
    3:13 -(1:05+1:07) = 1:01

    That's the flight time deficit! A fair bit, you say?
    Over 54 hours that's just a minute and a few seconds PER HOUR!
    Alternatively, over 34 legs, that's less than 2 minutes per leg!

    Pretty damn good flying, but not quite enough. Realistically, the difference was often taking a bit more time because we were tired or plain 'punchy'.
    Can we get better by 2 minutes per leg? I think so - if we practice and have enough pilots that are rested.

    Who says a few seconds don't matter.
    Looking back now when awake, I see some improvements we could have made. Such as leaving 2 RR Hornet and 1 SeaFury flights unused.

  3. #53
    Hey All,

    Well I'll chime in.

    First I think you guys did a great job! I was watching most of the weekend and I think the organization (spreadsheets, signups and everything) was outstanding.

    I have been around this race for I believe 12 years. DCC (of P38 fame) and I were on AVSIM team in 2005 if memory serves me right. I bought the FSD Cheyenne 400LS to fly in this race way back then.

    I have seen the good the bad and the ugly and may have caused some of it...

    That said I did not volunteer this year as my computer was bought in pieces in 2004/2005 and I use it to this day even though I have the pieces to a 4 or 5 year old machine 20 feet away that my son has upgraded to something else this year. My old computer is getting ever increasingly cantankerous all the time. Sometimes I or it reboots it 3 times over 5 or 6 hours - blue screen Windows has recovered from a serious error - you may know the drill... I don't want my computer holding the team back. If I pulled and reset the RAM maybe that would get better - who knows. I have decided to buy parts this weekend (Hmm skylake or Haswell E?) instead of my usual guns or guitars or camera lenses and such - so I should have a good system soon.

    Anyway I decided to step away this year. That said I was planning a route the saturday before cause I like to plan and I'll be looking at the results cause I like to analyze - in real life I'm trained as a scientist. What I saw plan wise was pretty similar to what we did - there were no magic bullets that occurred to me. I saw the greenland route versus what AVSIM did and I added up the distances start to Croatia - about 160nm further - <25 mins in a thoroughbred however there is an additional stop or two so maybe 40 mins total? But then if the winds are strong you can get some of that back and you have saved a jet leg for elsewhere so you should regain some time based on speed and the trick is to use it to gain some advantage. We were 90 odd mins back to Croatia but I don't think it was just due to greenland. I will say that AVSIM did a great job of maximizing jet distance (left less than 10nm on the table I believe while we left near 100 or so) and their jets were fast - real fast. At one point close to the mainland on the leg Hawaii to US mainland Srgalahad was like 7 or 8 thousand feet below PRB and going over 100 kts slower. I think maybe winds were huge this race. I wonder if Eamon made the wind statistic in Duenna output meaningful when he reprogrammed it? Anyway I think the team needs to really dive in to understand what happened. I'm pretty hesitant to say or do anything more since I didn't sign up. I just want to say I think you guys did great! Especially compared to some of the old races where we were hours and hours and even days behind...

    As for the flying - I can kinda take it or leave it. If the race flew planes I like to fly (fast GA but this race is and always has been WWII fighters at it's core) it would be more interesting to fly. Make no mistake I like the Alpha hornet because it is so well behaved but it is a bit short legged compared to the "I'm Available" P51. It is great that we use jets now and there are always many who like to fly jets. I like virtualcol embraers but they aren't white listed and cat 2 jets were not of any use this year except to max the jet distance as Avsim did.

    I would be totally in favor of an SOH event every 2 or 3 months for fun and practice as lack of confidence is I suspect often an issue. You guys should be proud of how well you "hung in" there and finished.

    -Ed-
    My heroes have always been cowboys and they all carried guns-
    and they all rode horses-that is all but one.
    When he went to the rescue he flew a Cessna plane.
    His ranch was called the "Flying Crown" and "Sky King" was his name. -Jim Dilly-

    The rich man writes the book of laws that the poor man must defend, but the highest laws are written on the hearts of honest men. - Ricky Skaggs-

  4. #54
    Charter Member 2022 srgalahad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    CYYC or MMSD (GMT -7)
    Posts
    5,080
    At one point close to the mainland on the leg Hawaii to US mainland Srgalahad was like 7 or 8 thousand feet below PRB and going over 100 kts slower.
    Nothing to do with wind...
    http://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforum...=1#post1009337

    More like "saving the bacon". When I discovered the fuel issue I could have abandoned the leg. I had faith in Paul's ability to get into Oxnard, barring any disasters. I elected to use the opportunity to learn a bit more about how to handle the emergency so I experimented. Then, once I had gotten to the point where I thought could make the coast and likely glide to a landing, and the cabin crew had served dinner, I started thinking about "what if"... Paul has an event (wind-shift causes overspeed, weather, crash on landing?) and doesn't make Oxnard. Then we go back to PHTO and lose 4 hours.
    Simple.. putter along at 250Kts indicated on two engines and minimal fuel and divert to Vandenberg which is now in reach. (The lower altitude was because I stalled it once in a three (3)* heading change and decided it wasn't worth the climb back up to FL370.) That makes a baton transfer still an option.

    If so, we lose 30 min. for the transfer and I landed 17 minutes after Paul so that would have been, at worst, 47 minutes instead of the 4 hrs.

    Note that on a previous leg our intrepid wingman landed dead-stick with dry tanks.

    So, how many people EVER practice unusual situations? Most worry about completing a NORMAL flight. let alone with a broken airplane, no fuel, or icing, no radios or GPS (can you navigate with an ADF only?)

    Such as leaving 2 RR Hornet and 1 SeaFury flights unused.
    And replace them with...? We used all the thoroughbred legs and all of the fastest regular a/c legs.

    Remember, 1 minute per hour, 2 minutes per leg? --- faster, tighter, harder flying would cover that. This year we were all tired and were forced to fly cautiously, but if, on every leg you can, you turn on course at 200 ft agl, turn final at 1 mile, not 5, descend at 4000 ft/min instead of 2000... That takes practice and confidence. Not a couple of flights, but many, in each type of aircraft, until it's 'natural' - then repeat at night then with marginal weather. THAT is flying competitively. That means practicing for 12 months, not 12 days. That doesn't mean you can't fly a 'favorite' aircraft to practice, but you can practice flying near the edge.

    "To some the sky is the limit. To others it is home" anon.
    “Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.” -Albert Einstein


  5. #55
    You guys all did a great job and should be proud of yourselves. I do not believe there was any one thing that slowed you down, like Rob said more cautious flying slowed you down. There were several flights where you did not have a wingman and that leads to more cautious flying like the good ol days.

    As for planning, I do not know how many planners you have/had but team AVSIM really only has 3 planners in our team. The route we took this year "Black Tickle™" was actually a route we investigated a couple years ago but couldn't use due to either length or winds. This year it was not only the shortest route of the 5 or 6 we had but the one with really favourable winds. We knew a couple days ahead of time that the winds across the north Atlantic were going to be good and it turns out they were GREAT.

    In the early stages of the race, we thought SOH was doing something similar to us when they headed to panama with us. When Flightsim went to colombia we assumed they were taking a south atlantic route, which is a route we looked at. With all 3 teams then heading north we knew all 3 of us had a similar plan. When you guys hit the big iron in cuba we were really wondering if you knew something we didn't or if you had made a mistake as we knew instantly that you had to goto greenland and iceland then. I commend you for going that route as getting into Narsarsuaq can be a pain at times. Now while it both took Team Outhouse and AVSIM 10 stops to get to croatia, our transatlantic trip was far faster and helped us pull ahead. After that it was just trying to stay ahead and we did notice you guys catching up quite a bit in the journey to australia.

    All in all you guys did a great job while being understaffed. Once Flightsim finishes and the final results are given I think we all need to have a cold beer.

  6. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by srgalahad View Post
    Nothing to do with wind...
    http://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforum...=1#post1009337

    More like "saving the bacon". When I discovered the fuel issue I could have abandoned the leg. I had faith in Paul's ability to get into Oxnard, barring any disasters. I elected to use the opportunity to learn a bit more about how to handle the emergency so I experimented. Then, once I had gotten to the point where I thought could make the coast and likely glide to a landing, and the cabin crew had served dinner, I started thinking about "what if"... Paul has an event (wind-shift causes overspeed, weather, crash on landing?) and doesn't make Oxnard. Then we go back to PHTO and lose 4 hours.
    Simple.. putter along at 250Kts indicated on two engines and minimal fuel and divert to Vandenberg which is now in reach. (The lower altitude was because I stalled it once in a three (3)* heading change and decided it wasn't worth the climb back up to FL370.) That makes a baton transfer still an option.

    If so, we lose 30 min. for the transfer and I landed 17 minutes after Paul so that would have been, at worst, 47 minutes instead of the 4 hrs.

    Note that on a previous leg our intrepid wingman landed dead-stick with dry tanks.

    So, how many people EVER practice unusual situations? Most worry about completing a NORMAL flight. let alone with a broken airplane, no fuel, or icing, no radios or GPS (can you navigate with an ADF only?)


    And replace them with...? We used all the thoroughbred legs and all of the fastest regular a/c legs.

    Remember, 1 minute per hour, 2 minutes per leg? --- faster, tighter, harder flying would cover that. This year we were all tired and were forced to fly cautiously, but if, on every leg you can, you turn on course at 200 ft agl, turn final at 1 mile, not 5, descend at 4000 ft/min instead of 2000... That takes practice and confidence. Not a couple of flights, but many, in each type of aircraft, until it's 'natural' - then repeat at night then with marginal weather. THAT is flying competitively. That means practicing for 12 months, not 12 days. That doesn't mean you can't fly a 'favorite' aircraft to practice, but you can practice flying near the edge.

    OUCH !
    That brings back the painful memory of the loss a few years ago (2010 IIRC) when 16 minutes was difference between victory and defeat. There were only a few of us awake at the end of 4 days flying, and DD and I were flying the 2nd to last leg and he had fuel issues and suggested he ditch and take the refly penalty. I as wing suggested a divert as I could easily make it. DD relented and the divert with transfer penalty cost us the race.

    Ya, I was never happy with the fact a crash and refly could've won us the cup when a good landing cost us so much. THAT'S one of the issues I don't care much for in this event, tho not something likely to change.
    "May fortune favor the foolish"
    MaddogK

  7. #57
    "replace them with...? We used all the thoroughbred legs and all of the fastest regular a/c legs."

    I think you are misreading my post Rob. I do not want replace them, I want to use them, and we didnt. The RR Hornet and SeaFury are two of the fastest normal AC we use.

  8. #58
    SOH-CM-2016
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sheffield, UK (EGSY)
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by srgalahad View Post
    Martin is sitting in a hotel in Japan muttering "if I'd only seen that..." and we discussed it during the race. However, if there had been 4 or five or ten people testing plans instead of one or two, it might well have been noticed. Planners need not be flyers, either, but they seem scarce.
    Yes, exactly. I knew I'd missed something in selecting the route, it was only a matter of "what". As it turns out, I missed the opportunity to fly Canada to Ireland. Not only was that 200nm shorter, but it also had far stronger tail winds (120-160 knots!), compared to our Greenland/Iceland/England route. With more planners involved, we might (or might not) have spotted that. AVSIM had three times more planners than SOH, and it showed.

    AVSIM also flew better/faster. We made mistakes, where they didn't. I'm annoyed at myself for flying a leg and running out of fuel mid leg (aircraft failed to switch fuel tanks automatically, while I was multi-tasking and trying to plan where to do jet and GA legs). Ideally I shouldn't have been flying and planning at the same time.

    Also, look at their jet legs. A pair of PMDG 777s from PHUP to KSBA in 3:37 and 3:44. That's flying of the highest quality, and far faster than anything the tired SOH and Flightsim jet pilots could manage.

    The best team won, and the other two teams shouldn't feel disheartened by that. But the other two teams do need more planners and pilots next year...!
    Martin (FS RTW Race pilot 2009-19)
    Win7 x64 | MSI X79A-GD65 | Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core 3.60 GHz | 16GB DDR3/1600MHz Quad Channel Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  9. #59
    Charter Member 2022 srgalahad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    CYYC or MMSD (GMT -7)
    Posts
    5,080
    Quote Originally Posted by robert41 View Post
    "replace them with...? We used all the thoroughbred legs and all of the fastest regular a/c legs."

    I think you are misreading my post Rob. I do not want replace them, I want to use them, and we didn't. The RR Hornet and SeaFury are two of the fastest normal AC we use.
    Gotcha. Perhaps we could have used them except that the RR Hornet is FSX only and we were about 50/50 on FS9 vs FSX flyers at any time. I've always liked the Sea Fury but not everyone does, nor is practiced in it (another note on the "to do" list). Considering the fatigue factor, perhaps the slower but safer option was best in the situation. I have learned that flying the fastest aircraft does not ensure the fastest time (30 minute transfer penalties hurt!), except in an ideal world.

    "To some the sky is the limit. To others it is home" anon.
    “Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.” -Albert Einstein


  10. #60
    Senior Administrator Willy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    West Tennessee, near KTGC
    Age
    67
    Posts
    11,622
    Quote Originally Posted by srgalahad View Post
    I have learned that flying the fastest aircraft does not ensure the fastest time (30 minute transfer penalties hurt!), except in an ideal world.
    That was the beauty of DCC's P-38s. Not the fastest aircraft out there, but the one mostly to complete a leg.

    On the flight from Hawaii to California, Rob did the smart thing. In our nightly online flights for the most part, if things start going wrong, we just ride it out and see if we can recover from it. There's usually something you can do if you know your aircraft.
    Let Being Helpful Be More Important Than Being Right.

  11. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by srgalahad View Post
    Gotcha. Perhaps we could have used them except that the RR Hornet is FSX only and we were about 50/50 on FS9 vs FSX flyers at any time. I've always liked the Sea Fury but not everyone does, nor is practiced in it (another note on the "to do" list). Considering the fatigue factor, perhaps the slower but safer option was best in the situation. I have learned that flying the fastest aircraft does not ensure the fastest time (30 minute transfer penalties hurt!), except in an ideal world.
    Ahh, yes. Forgot about The Hornet being for FSX. My goof.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •