Bruce448: Thank you very much, the repaints you have mad are amazing. Too bad your idea about JF hosting them for a good cause did not fall out as planned.
Sadly the workaround to have the sim (P3D v2.5) run in windowed mode does not work.
Eagerly awaiting a new hotfix!
Johan
???
Interesting post ;D. So if I have on my PC very advanced models (with much more advanced avionics than JF Tornado) like PMDG 737 NGX and Majestic Software Dash 8 - Q400 in VC, from front position of pilot 40-45 fps on the ground (VRS F/A-18E + TacPack too with all systems ON!) in the airport of the same situation and here 20-24 is it ok for You? Maybe yes, but for me "No". It means than a model has a problem, not a soft or hardware of user or settings in this case. We don't compare JF Tornado with Piper Cub, default Cessna or JF DHC-1, just with very similar models & military jets, two seaters too.
I have i7 4770 with OC 4,3 GHz + R9 R290X, memory 8Gb 1600MHz, Z87 Intel Chipset and FSX only on SSD disc. Is it minimum of requirements ? Gosh....
Here is an interestng example for You from the last few days: "Batman: Arkham Knight for PC pulled by Warner Bros after bugs and disastrous launch" (performances problems on PC).
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...-10344079.html
Poor people, developer released very buggy game ("B:AC") but users must change a hardware according You...
I belive than great Team of JT Tornado will do everything for perfomance of this model like in others, according me Canberra was the great success, I (or We) can wait for sure for new patches for this and I'm sure than in the final everything will be ok for happy flying .
My fingers are crossed.
Last edited by YoYo; June 28th, 2015 at 04:45.
Webmaster of yoyosims.pl.
Win 10 64, i9 13900 KF, RTX 4090 24Gb, RAM64Gb, SSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5 [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro
Yoyo,
Agreed 150%! But I'm pretty sure that Justflight will come up with a suitable patch!
I'm also pretty sure that they are working right now and very hard on the necessary things. My rig is comparable to yours and there should be no need to turn the settings down just for one model.
On a more positive note: the model is gorgeous, so in the end we will have a real winner!
Cheers,
Johan
Pre-ordered for the 1st. and last time I simply ate to buy a product and wait after the release for patching. It seems that beta-testers use only world-record performance hardware. Just Flight I' m very disappointed.
The more you do, the less you dream
An interesting comparison as Yo-Yo mentioned the Majestic Dash8. I'm solid in the 30's with everything turned on (same startup situation as the Tornado) which is well over double what I get from the Tornado with everything turned off and 4x faster than pre-patch.
Oo-er!!
ATB
DaveB
I meant hate not ate sorry but English is not my native tongue
The more you do, the less you dream
I wonder whether the beta testers all have rigs with 3 x GTX 970 in SLI, 32 Gb's of RAM and a CPU running at 5.6 Ghz!
You are wrong ! They all have more powerfull rigs!!!
The more you do, the less you dream
ok, time for some truth or dare!
Dear Betatesters, we dare you to share with us the specs of your testing rigs!!
Johan
PS: this is all just in good humour. I always have been and always will be a staunch supporter of JF!
I think it's possibly the huge size of the mdls that are the problem. The exterior model is 94mb & the VC model over 100mb, with well over 1000 drawcalls! Looking though my hanger, the next biggest is the JF Canberra, but most other complex aircraft are in the 20-30mb range. I appreciate this is a complex & well detailed model, but those file sizes seem excessive to me.
Hardly! I did all my work on an i7 2600 @3.4GHz, 8GB RAM, a single GTX760 with Win7 64 bit operating system. To be honest, I was surprised to see the comments about fps, having not noticed a problem throughout.
To give you an example of what I'm seeing, I took a low-level run through the mountains from Valley to St Athan this morning. GenX photoscenery with treescapes, Active Sky Next real weather with REX textures - it was a grotty morning with plenty of cloud about! I was blatting along at about 420kts, getting the occasional blurring of the photoscenery (I get that with any aircraft low and fast) and my fps remained in the 25 - 32 range in the VC. With film movies generally being 24fps, I consider what I'm getting to be perfectly acceptable considering the fairly high scenery settings I'm running.
I may be wrong, but I don't think any of the testers has a 'monster machine', much as we all might wish for one.
Well, I run an i7 2700K @ 4.3 Ghz, 16 Gb's of RAM and a GTX970 card. I am a P3D v2.5 user though. But P3D resides on an SSD.
Taking off from Marham in clear weather I get about 20 FPS in the VC, 32 outside. That is not normal for a rig like mine.
In the Canberra, I get about 48 FPS in the VC, same scenery in lousy weather. Like DaveWG said, it is the humongous sizes of the models and the many drawcalls.
And no, I really don't want to be a pain.
Johan
I have an average spec PC: i7 4770k at 4.0GHz, 8 GB RAM, 1x GTX970. I just made a 1 hour+ flight from RAF Marham to RAF Lossiemouth on the UKMIL Virtual Airline with the hotfix "light" VC and FSX kept an average FPS between 23-29 FPS. VAS consumption: I started using 1,900 Mb, after shutting down at Lossie FSX used 2,500 Mb, no problem there.
My scenery: Orbx England + ACG/MAIW/UKMIL RAF airbases.
Edit: Windows 7 64bit / FSX-MS tweaked according Nick's bible.
Perhaps here is the problem. Model is overtextured and has too many drawcalls.
Can You check for example AS F-14 for this?
btw. Tornado topic on JF forum:
http://forum.justflight.com/forum_po...ramerate-issue
some people said about 8-10 fps in VC... : (
Last edited by YoYo; June 28th, 2015 at 09:24.
Webmaster of yoyosims.pl.
Win 10 64, i9 13900 KF, RTX 4090 24Gb, RAM64Gb, SSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5 [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro
I think Im just gonna sit tight on purchasing this one for a couple of months. Let the kinks get worked out and see what folks say then. Much as I love the Tornado, what I read here suggests caution.
Beta testers have, as far as I'm aware average computers. Mines not a particularly high end rig, but it is sufficient:
Intel i7 4790K 4.0GHz
GeForce GTX 970
16GB 1866 Ram
The computer is set up as per Nick N's recommendations and I run Horizon/Playsims photo scenery on FSX and Orbx on P3D, REX textures and ASN.
Ian
Bookmarks