Hi Kelti,
Actually, I have all the planes you mentioned and then some. I did a comparison study with the following results:
AF Scrubb: a)collision bubble fixable
b)animated parts:
-canopy
-cowl flaps
-control surfaces
-wheels roll
c)vc - very good (non-functioning)
d)FPS @ 3000ft = 27.0
Bruno Duffort: a)collision bubble fixable
b)animated parts:
-canopy
-cowl flaps
-control surfaces
-wheels roll
c)vc - excellent
d)FPS @ 3000ft = 52 - 55
Bruce Thorson: a)collision bubble fixable
b)animated parts:
-canopy
-cowl flaps
-control surfaces
-wheels turn
c)vc - excellent (non-functioning)
d)FPS @ 3000ft = 27
Flight 1: a)collision bubble fixable
b)animated parts:
-control surfaces
-wheels turn
c)vc - good (non-functioning)
d)FPS @ 3000ft = 50
Kwagmyre: a)collision bubble fixable (Yes, I was able to.)
b)animated parts:
-canopy (linked to flaps, however)
-control surfaces
c)vc - poor (non-functioning)
d)FPS @ 3000ft = 58.8
Lindsey Watt: a)collision bubble fixable
b)animated parts:
-canopy
-cowl flaps
-control surfaces
-wheels turn
c)vc - excellent (some animated parts)
d)FPS @ 3000ft = 18
My computer specs are: Compaq Presario C571NR Notebook
Intel T2080 Processor 1.73GHz
2GB RAM
Win Vista Home Premium/SP2/ 32-bit
Unfortunately, until I'm able to get a newer computer, I'm rather stuck using older models as they get much better performance even though I must sacrifice in the area of animated parts among other things. This is also why I often see if older planes can "updated" or modified.
By the way, Bruno's plane is by far and away my favorite, not just in fps, but in appearance as well. Just wish there wasn't a restriction on repaints.
TW
Bookmarks