Some 2012 race statistics
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: Some 2012 race statistics

  1. #1
    SOH-CM-2016
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sheffield, UK (EGSY)
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,488

    Some 2012 race statistics

    I downloaded the online Duenna data, extracted the erroneous flights (crashes, cleanups, etc), and then put the flight data into a pivot table.

    First, here's the average speed obtained by each aircraft type.
    Aircraft Average of Grnd Spd (knts)
    Jet
    477
    B747
    497
    A318
    466
    B727
    464
    B777
    457
    B737
    401
    Thoroughbred
    404
    P-47 Thunderbolt
    415
    DH Hornet (Alpha)
    407
    P-51H Mustang
    403
    Regular
    360
    P180 Avanti
    390
    Epic LT
    384
    Sea Fury FB11
    370
    P-51B Mustang
    363
    F8F2 Bearcat
    359
    F7F-3 Tigercat
    356
    DH Hornet (SOH)
    354
    P-51C Mustang
    354
    Do 328
    351
    P-51D Mustang
    336
    Beech KA350
    332
    Howard 500
    279
    Team
    154
    P-38 Lightning
    283
    Beech B58
    185
    Mooney Bravo
    172
    Vin Fiz
    55
    Grand Total
    352

    No surprise to see the 747 heading the jet category. The P-47 only got flown once, so the stats don't show reality, which is that it isn't faster than the Hot Hornet and H Mustang. In the Regular category the turboprops top the list (P-180 Avanti and Epic LT), ahead of the warbirds. Avsim in particular made good use of the Avanti, flown high in strong tailwinds.

    The Sea Fury is now the fastest warbird that isn't in the Thoroughbred list, but of course the White List may change next year. In a cluster just behind it are the other Mustangs, the Bearcat, the Tigercat, and the more realsitic SOH Hornet.
    Martin (FS RTW Race pilot 2009-19)
    Win7 x64 | MSI X79A-GD65 | Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core 3.60 GHz | 16GB DDR3/1600MHz Quad Channel Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  2. #2
    SOH-CM-2016
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sheffield, UK (EGSY)
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,488
    Here are the average speeds for each team (including jets, thoroughbreds and regulars, but not team flights).

    Clearly not much difference between the teams, so the winner is decided by route, strategy, most bonuses and fewest penalties.
    Team Average of Grnd Spd (knts)
    Avsim 398.4
    FlightSim 395.9
    Sim-Outhouse 397.9
    Grand Total 397.4
    Martin (FS RTW Race pilot 2009-19)
    Win7 x64 | MSI X79A-GD65 | Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core 3.60 GHz | 16GB DDR3/1600MHz Quad Channel Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  3. #3
    SOH-CM-2016
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sheffield, UK (EGSY)
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,488
    And here's one for Rob, the fastest Vin Fiz driver on the SOH team...

    Pilot Average of Grnd Spd (knts)
    Vin Fiz 54.7
    Srgalahad 62.4
    Spookster67 61.8
    Dangerousdave26 60.6
    Crash-soh 60.0
    Prb 57.8
    Tako_kichi 56.1
    Maddogk 49.9
    Moparmike 42.8
    Soh Moses 41.1
    Grand Total 54.7
    Martin (FS RTW Race pilot 2009-19)
    Win7 x64 | MSI X79A-GD65 | Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core 3.60 GHz | 16GB DDR3/1600MHz Quad Channel Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  4. #4
    SOH Staff Tako_Kichi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    SW Ontario, Canada (Ex-pat Brit)
    Age
    67
    Posts
    5,123
    Some very interesting figures there, thanks for collating all that info Martin.
    Larry


  5. #5
    Pearl Harbor Project developer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Big D .. Dallas
    Age
    56
    Posts
    2,426
    Hey I made the top 5 in something. I have the payware Avanti.... guess I need to get a checkride to re-cert.
    crashAZ- Virtual Navy
    [SIGPIC]http://www.sim-outhouse.net/images/rtwr2013/rtwr2013_sm.png[/SIGPIC]

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookster67 View Post
    Team Average of Grnd Spd (knts)
    Avsim 398.4
    FlightSim 395.9
    Sim-Outhouse 397.9
    Grand Total 397.4

    Martin,

    I crunched all the numbers myself earlier today and came up with the same numbers.. I knew we were the fastest.. Had we not goofed up Australia things would have been close at the end.

    Were you one of the planners this year? I wanna shake the hand of the person who not only decided on the polar route but managed to convince the team it was a good idea.

    We examined a polar route but was worried that we may not have been able to fly out of the "void" and you know fsx doesn't do the poles correctly...

    It was a well fought race. I thought we had you guys when we passed you in Europe.. We were speculating that you guys let us pass you so we didn't discover your plan until we were too far along..

    I was actually thinking about giving you guys a heads up that you didn't get your two south 40 airports but once you took off from NZCH we knew.. I had a mapping suite created at http://rtw.no-ip.org/avsimtracker that we were using to keep an eye on the teams.. I wrote a piece of custom software that would grab up to date positions from the duenna site so we knew what was going on at all times.. We also had our possible routes on it so it wasn't public during the race, but it's open now but just shows the routes taken..

    Anyways I have rambled too long, good effort all, great race.
    Lest we forget, team AVSIM is the fastest..

  7. #7
    Pearl Harbor Project developer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Big D .. Dallas
    Age
    56
    Posts
    2,426
    Aha! Nice programming! Well we can say we went around the South Pole 3.5 times.
    crashAZ- Virtual Navy
    [SIGPIC]http://www.sim-outhouse.net/images/rtwr2013/rtwr2013_sm.png[/SIGPIC]

  8. #8
    Senior Administrator PRB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    MO (KSUS)
    Age
    62
    Posts
    9,410
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    ... I wanna shake the hand of the person who not only decided on the polar route but managed to convince the team it was a good idea...
    That is a story worth telling, but I will let the person who needs to tell the story do so...

    Nice tracking program too!
    MB: GIGABYTE GA-X299 UD4 PRO ATX
    CPU: Intel(R) Core™ Processor i9-10900X Ten-Core 3.7GHz
    MEM: 64GB (8GBx8) DDR4/3000MHz Quad Channel
    GPU: RTX 3080 Ti 12GB GDDR6
    OS: Win 10 Pro 64bit
    HP Reverb G2

  9. #9
    SOH Staff Tako_Kichi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    SW Ontario, Canada (Ex-pat Brit)
    Age
    67
    Posts
    5,123
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    I wanna shake the hand of the person who not only decided on the polar route but managed to convince the team it was a good idea.
    Quote Originally Posted by PRB View Post
    That is a story worth telling, but I will let the person who needs to tell the story do so...
    Unfortunately the person who needs to tell the story is not a member here at SOH and therefore does not have posting rights. That person also does not fly in Flight Sim nor have they ever planned out a route for a flight simulator before.

    The person concerned has been involved in a 'back-room' role for Team SOH for four years now and is generally employed as a 'spy', camping out on the other team forums to see where they are going next and picking up any nuggets of info they can find and then reporting back to 'race control'. While the route planning was being discussed between Dave and myself on our TeamSpeak server this person decided to check something out after seeing one of the ideas I was plotting out in Google Earth.

    A while later I was asked the question "Has anyone thought about going via the South Pole because I've just plotted a route from New Zealand to Rio that's 2,400 Nm shorter than the one you are planning?"

    My reaction to this was..... !

    Needless to say there was then some frantic discussions on TS and it took us a full day of practice with several team members involved to work out a method of getting in and out of the pole safely and predictably given the known issues. The final result proved to be not only workable but a truly viable option but we needed to work as a team and we had to be blessed with good weather (always an unknown issue down there). We did keep our original plan just in case we decided to bail at the last second and the decision to go to the pole was always going to be taken when we got to the first NZ airport. If the weather was good it was on, if not then we would have been taking an almost identical route to yours.

    The route we followed was the one drawn up originally by the person with no route planning experience at all. No changes were made and every leg from NZ to Rio was either done in a jet or a thoroughbred aircraft and it turned out to be the fastest section of the race we flew, helped in part by the excellent jet stream winds that I had been tracking for at least a week before the race started. I knew that the mid south pacific crossing was going to be too high to benefit but the polar route lay right in the middle of the jet stream track. It pushed us down to the pole and it pushed us back out again and right up the east coast of South America and the Duenna details bear that out, 483.9 kts in a P-51H on one of the legs is outstanding by anyone's standards!

    The rest I guess is history and the 2012 RTWR will certainly be remembered for many years to come, and rightly so.

    Oh by the way, the person who came up with the route was......................




































    ....my wife, Karen!

    :ernae:
    Larry


  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Tako_Kichi View Post
    ....my wife, Karen!

    :ernae:
    Oh Great now we will Lose her to Free Agency...

    ASUS TUF F17 Gaming Laptop
    17.3" 144Hz Full HD IPS-Type
    CPU 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-11800H @ 2.30GHz 2.30 GHz
    Ram CORSAIR Vengeance 32.0 GB DDR4 3200
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU 6GB

  11. #11
    It should be noted that is was a team decision to attempt the polar route AFTER the route was conceived by 'our secret weapon'. 3 days of practice and planning those 4 hops, with the exception of the 'transition' flights between the 2 sims.

    Rest assured it was NOT a last minute decision or a desperate gamble.
    "May fortune favor the foolish"
    MaddogK

  12. #12
    Pearl Harbor Project developer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Big D .. Dallas
    Age
    56
    Posts
    2,426
    Quote Originally Posted by Dangerousdave26 View Post
    Oh Great now we will Lose her to Free Agency...

    ROFL!!!!!
    crashAZ- Virtual Navy
    [SIGPIC]http://www.sim-outhouse.net/images/rtwr2013/rtwr2013_sm.png[/SIGPIC]

  13. #13
    SOH Staff
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    State of Confusion..... -8GMT
    Posts
    3,775
    it is not rare, that the inexperienced
    come up with innovative ideas.
    the trick is to get the experienced
    to listen to those ideas.

    i highly recommend
    a group hug for Karen.

    i especially like hearing Karen in the background,
    when Larry's on TeamSpeak.

    side note;
    years ago, i tried to get my wife and son
    interested in flight simming.
    no luck at all
    sometimes the magic works.
    sometimes it doesn't.

  14. #14
    Ohh very good..

    Once we noticed you guys took off south, there was much discussion in our team speak as we did look into a polar route.. We however didn't really take it seriously enough due to FSX flaws near the poles, but we knew you guys must have practiced it or you wouldn't have gone there..

    It was hilarious later as you guys were leaving the south pole, one of our team members piped up with the possibility you guys didn't cross all lines of longitude while doing that route, so we all broke out our maps, our planners etc to see if this faux pas was true.. Well we discovered that yes, if you draw a straight line using the airports you chose, that you technically flew west back to South America.. However we all knew you guys must have known this and done something about it and Mike discovered that yes, you guys did fly a quick jaunt around the pole just for this very requirement.

    Well done folks.. Very creative but i get the feeling either the south pole station or mcmurdo might be closed for repairs next year (we'll see what the committee come up with).. Same crew that has been working on wake island for how long now?? LOL Just can't keep it together those repair crews..

  15. #15
    Pearl Harbor Project developer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Big D .. Dallas
    Age
    56
    Posts
    2,426
    Yep we thought of everything... as wingman on the outbound flight I thought I would offer myself as a sacrifice to the pole gods so that The Spookster could fly away safely.


    Luckily the pole gods were benevolent entities and finally let go of me to finish the trip.
    crashAZ- Virtual Navy
    [SIGPIC]http://www.sim-outhouse.net/images/rtwr2013/rtwr2013_sm.png[/SIGPIC]

  16. #16
    SOH Staff Tako_Kichi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    SW Ontario, Canada (Ex-pat Brit)
    Age
    67
    Posts
    5,123
    Quote Originally Posted by crashaz View Post
    Yep we thought of everything... as wingman on the outbound flight I thought I would offer myself as a sacrifice to the pole gods so that The Spookster could fly away safely.


    Luckily the pole gods were benevolent entities and finally let go of me to finish the trip.
    Have the dizzy spells stopped yet Crash?



    Larry


  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    i get the feeling either the south pole station or mcmurdo might be closed for repairs next year (we'll see what the committee come up with).. Same crew that has been working on wake island for how long now?? LOL Just can't keep it together those repair crews..
    Reminds me of restricter plates they put on stock cars, to keep the speeds down, because they're too dangerous to go fast, and the drivers cant be trusted to drive safely.

    Boo-Hoo.
    "May fortune favor the foolish"
    MaddogK

  18. #18
    SOH-CM-2016
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sheffield, UK (EGSY)
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    Martin,I crunched all the numbers myself earlier today and came up with the same numbers.. I knew we were the fastest.. Had we not goofed up Australia things would have been close at the end.Were you one of the planners this year? I wanna shake the hand of the person who not only decided on the polar route but managed to convince the team it was a good idea.
    I did do some route planning, but to be honest Dave and Larry had it very well organized, and all I added was a couple of optimizations of the route around Canada and Africa. Nothing like as significant as the "optimization" Karen spotted though!
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    We examined a polar route but was worried that we may not have been able to fly out of the "void" and you know fsx doesn't do the poles correctly...
    We spent a long time practicing landing and take-offs at McMurdo and the South Pole. I re-mapped the airfield so we could reliably find the safe landing strip. And we still lost a flight into the frozen swamp at the end of McMurdo's runway. It was a high risk / high reward strategy.
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    It was a well fought race. I thought we had you guys when we passed you in Europe.. We were speculating that you guys let us pass you so we didn't discover your plan until we were too far along..
    I was going to suggest that we get our slow flights done to let you guys past, but didn't. As it turned out you flew right past us anyway, well done.
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    Lest we forget, team AVSIM is the fastest..
    Well yes, and no. In the air I think you were the fastest, but I got the impression you were taking a slightly longer route in order to get more mileage in jets. For example in north west Canada you were some way south of us - we thought you might be heading for Madeira - but in fact you were just lengthening your jet leg into BGBW. I enjoyed our head to head jet race to KEGE - I really had to push the barber pole in the 727 to stop your two 747s catching me - but again you flew the longer Rwy 25 option whereas I flew straight in on Rwy 07.
    Martin (FS RTW Race pilot 2009-19)
    Win7 x64 | MSI X79A-GD65 | Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core 3.60 GHz | 16GB DDR3/1600MHz Quad Channel Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson View Post
    It was a well fought race. I thought we had you guys when we passed you in Europe.. We were speculating that you guys let us pass you so we didn't discover your plan until we were too far along..
    We discussed that on the way and it did seem desirable to let you pass. That is one of the reasons why we threw in the Night Default Team Flight at the last minute...

    In India...

    In IFR Weather.
    ASUS TUF F17 Gaming Laptop
    17.3" 144Hz Full HD IPS-Type
    CPU 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-11800H @ 2.30GHz 2.30 GHz
    Ram CORSAIR Vengeance 32.0 GB DDR4 3200
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU 6GB

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by epwatson
    We had at least 3 of us come up with various plans, and each one of us picked that airport as our entry into Australia.. Had just one of us zoomed in on the map just a little bit more then we might have seen it but we took it for granted..


    That just made my day !

    "May fortune favor the foolish"
    MaddogK

  21. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by MaddogK View Post


    That just made my day !
    Do you wanna know what made my day? When we found out that Flightsim had picked the exact same airport for their entry into Australia but because we got there over 12 hours before they did, and our error was made evident they were able to alter their plan accordingly..

  22. #22
    SOH-CM-2016
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sheffield, UK (EGSY)
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,488
    I've filled in the missing flights for the Team SOH pilots (people who were flying off-line) using the posted Duenna JPG data. Here's the summary of who flew for SOH. Other teams to follow...

    Values
    Row Labels Sum of Time Count of State
    Moparmike 19:53:31 13
    primary baton 12:26:15 9
    wingman 06:23:33 3
    ok 01:03:43 1
    Dangerousdave26 19:20:38 14
    primary baton 12:10:12 8
    wingman 05:55:15 4
    ok 01:15:11 2
    Spookster67 16:04:10 11
    primary baton 11:52:16 7
    wingman 02:37:11 2
    ok 01:34:43 2
    fliger747 15:18:58 9
    wingman 14:11:23 8
    ok 01:07:35 1
    Wnd 10:58:04 8
    primary baton 08:30:42 6
    wingman 02:27:22 2
    Maddogk 10:33:34 7
    primary baton 01:24:04 1
    failed primary baton 04:14:00 1
    wingman 02:37:54 2
    ok 02:17:36 3
    Tako_kichi 10:14:11 8
    wingman 09:50:46 7
    ok 00:23:25 1
    Soh Moses 10:03:33 8
    primary baton 07:42:28 6
    wingman 01:57:34 1
    ok 00:23:31 1
    Prb 09:36:16 7
    primary baton 04:26:12 3
    wingman 05:10:04 4
    Crash-soh 07:30:37 5
    primary baton 02:38:48 2
    wingman 04:27:13 2
    ok 00:24:36 1
    Flyin Bull 06:21:35 7
    primary baton 06:21:35 7
    Srgalahad 03:48:38 4
    wingman 02:35:57 2
    ok 01:12:41 2
    Ferry_vo 03:01:01 2
    primary baton 03:01:01 2
    cputters 01:38:24 1
    wingman 01:38:24 1
    Taco 01:31:02 1
    wingman 01:31:02 1
    Grand Total 73:54:12 105
    Martin (FS RTW Race pilot 2009-19)
    Win7 x64 | MSI X79A-GD65 | Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core 3.60 GHz | 16GB DDR3/1600MHz Quad Channel Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  23. #23
    Senior Administrator PRB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    MO (KSUS)
    Age
    62
    Posts
    9,410
    Good stuff Spookster. What does the "ok" line indicate?
    MB: GIGABYTE GA-X299 UD4 PRO ATX
    CPU: Intel(R) Core™ Processor i9-10900X Ten-Core 3.7GHz
    MEM: 64GB (8GBx8) DDR4/3000MHz Quad Channel
    GPU: RTX 3080 Ti 12GB GDDR6
    OS: Win 10 Pro 64bit
    HP Reverb G2

  24. #24
    SOH-CM-2016
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sheffield, UK (EGSY)
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by PRB View Post
    Good stuff Spookster. What does the "ok" line indicate?
    That's the Duenna status you get if you are not identified as baton or wingman. So in other words, those are the team flights of the non-baton/wing pilots.
    Martin (FS RTW Race pilot 2009-19)
    Win7 x64 | MSI X79A-GD65 | Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core 3.60 GHz | 16GB DDR3/1600MHz Quad Channel Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 2GB

  25. #25
    Senior Administrator PRB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    MO (KSUS)
    Age
    62
    Posts
    9,410
    Rgr that. Explains why I have no ok, since I only participated in one team flight, in which I was the wing.
    MB: GIGABYTE GA-X299 UD4 PRO ATX
    CPU: Intel(R) Core™ Processor i9-10900X Ten-Core 3.7GHz
    MEM: 64GB (8GBx8) DDR4/3000MHz Quad Channel
    GPU: RTX 3080 Ti 12GB GDDR6
    OS: Win 10 Pro 64bit
    HP Reverb G2

Members who have read this thread: 1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •