FSX
Was referring to BushHawk. But thanks for the info re frames/performance on the A2A Cub. Maybe I'll get it... or BushHawk... or Do-27:isadizzy::isadizzy:Originally Posted by Oli-TUB
Was referring to BushHawk. But thanks for the info re frames/performance on the A2A Cub. Maybe I'll get it... or BushHawk... or Do-27:isadizzy::isadizzy:
The BushHawk is quite a hog. Not as bad as the Do-27 which is the worst of all. But if you already have a 'challenged' system (like I do) the Cub and especially the ACA might be the better choice.
I could have sworn the bush hawk came with reduced sized textures??
AMD FX 8-Core Black 4.2Ghz, 8G Ram 2TB HD, W8.1 pending W10, ATI R5 2G X2 Crossfire
http://www.canadianarcticfse.com/
Personally I would still go for the Bush Hawk. However if you want a Super Cub then I would wait a while and get this; the Super Cub X, by Simon Smeiman, available from FSAddon soon. I'm guessing it won't be as well simulated as the A2A Cub , but it sure looks pretty. Not sure on how far it is away from release. Screenshots here:
http://fsaddon.eu/wpfsaddon/product-...-x-collection/
"There is an art . . . to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss"
— Douglas Adams, 'The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy'
Yep, I've been following both Super Cub developments (FSAddon and Flight Replicas). Whoever comes up first with their Super Cub gets my money.
But indeed the RealAir Scouts are highly highly recommended. Great frames, even greater flight characteristics. And a darn nice plane to see and fly!
More info here: http://www.realairsimulations.com/fl...=scout07_intro
Anneke
I only want the Scout model, and wouldn't want to pay for Decathlon and Citabria.
indeed...
Anneke
Members who have read this thread: 1
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks