OT: Painting Planes Silver?
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: OT: Painting Planes Silver?

  1. #1

    OT: Painting Planes Silver?

    I had the good fortune to see the B-17 "Aluminum Overcast' this past weekend and only afterwards did I figure out what has always struck me as odd about it. It's painted silver, not unlike the B-29 'Fifi' is painted a silvery grey. My question is simple: Why?

    My first thought is for preservation purposes, but there are plenty of bare metal WW2 aircraft still flying. The B-17 I flew in several years ago, 'Yankee Lady', is one such example. If they can do it, why not 'Aluminum Overcast' and Fifi'?

    In 'Aluminum Overcast's case, I would think that if you were going to paint it anyway, why not go iconic and pick an olive drab scheme? I know most B-17s were bare metal, but the ones that define our image of the air war over Germany are the ones from '43.

  2. #2
    In WWII, a bare aluminum finish was generally more common than silver paint, though I think the British may have used silver paint at times, and P-51 eventually started coming from the factory with silver paint on portions of the wings. The bare aluminum would be in a couple of different finishes, depending on how it got that way. If the aircraft had never been painted and came that way from the factory, it would be quite reflective - at least initially. After a few months outdoors the finish would dull somewhat due to oxidation. If, as was often the case during that period where USAAF units were transitioning from olive drab to bare metal, the original paint was stripped off, it would have a more dull, burnished appearance.

    For modern restorations, it takes a LOT of work to maintain a bare aluminum finish, and the metal is much more susceptible to damage. The aluminum skin is actually an alclad sandwich, with an aluminum alloy in the center for strength (since pure aluminum is very weak), and a pure aluminum plating on both sides. Pure aluminum does not corrode, so it protects the alloy from the elements. However the aluminum plating is only a couple thousandths of an inch thick, and is very soft. So even a small scratch can penetrate the plating to the alloy inside and expose it to corrosion. Restorers who want the authenticity of a bare aluminum finish know that they are taking on a lot of extra maintenance to keep it in good condition, and for them, it's worth it. Others want something easier and cheaper to maintain, so they go with aluminum paint which goes a long way in protecting the skin, and only has to be washed, not polished.

  3. #3
    It is sort of related to the glossy vs. flat paint argument on restored warbirds as well - glossy paint will always hold up better, be easier to clean and will last longer in good shape, but of course flat finishes are generally more authentic. Some guys will only ever choose glossy paint to save their investment and look showroom quality, while other guys will only ever choose flat paint for authenticity/accuracy. There are groups/organizations that simply do not want to invest the time and energy (or cost) to maintain a bare metal aircraft, while there are others that do so with a great amount of pride. There have been times where with restored bombers, like Aluminum Overcast, FIFI, or even B-25's such as "Maid in the Shade" and "How Boot That", that due to the condition of the original metal skins (rash/pitting/outer layer of Alclad worn away/patches/etc.), they chose to paint the airframes silver for a nice uniform appearance. For an organization that constantly is flying their aircraft every day, it is also counterproductive to try and maintain a bare metal aircraft - the Collings Foundation had a real heck of a time trying to do so with just their TP-51C. Collings acquired the polished bare metal B-17G that used to be part of the Evergreen Air Museum, but before it ever tours with the Collings Foundation, they're also going to be painting it in an OD/grey paint scheme, so as to not have to worry about all of the time/energy required to keep the bare metal maintained. I know with a local B-25, "Miss Mitchell", when it was being restored back in the 80's, some of the guys involved wanted to simply paint it so as to not have to put in all of the work to polish the airframe, nor all of the work that would have to be required each year to maintain the finish. Fortunately, the voices of a few at the time prevailed, persuading the group that it would be a far better looking aircraft if it were bare metal (and painted in authentic, historically-accurate markings), and everyone involved with the aircraft seems to have agreed ever since that it was the right decision.

    Expanding on Gecko's post - on P-51 production during WWII, from the earliest production examples, they filled the wing panel butt joints, screws and rivet heads, within the first 40% of the chord of the wing, and sanded it smooth, prior to the camouflage paint being applied. When camouflage paint was done away with in early 1944, the wings were painted in dull silver instead, so as to continue to protect the filler and to match the look of the rest of the bare metal airframe. Post-WWII, in the USAF, there were a great many P-51's (then called TF-51's) that were painted overall silver, by the early 1950's, after having gone through overhaul facilities and being rebuilt/zero-timed. Australia did the same with their Mustangs, painting them silver in the post-war years as well.

  4. #4
    Thanks for the info!

Members who have read this thread: 0

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •