Xtreme Prototypes Lear 20 Series Questions
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Xtreme Prototypes Lear 20 Series Questions

  1. #1
    members+
    Fighter Fanatic
    PilatusTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Age
    38
    Posts
    417

    Xtreme Prototypes Lear 20 Series Questions

    I'm looking for a light jet, like a Lear 23-25. I know Xtreme has discontinued the 20 series, but PC Aviator still has it. I want the old retro steam gauges, and the Franz Lear 23 just uses the default 45 cockpit.

    Anyone have these ships, the Lear 20 series? How are they optimized and on frames and what not? I'm about to purchase them, I just hate when ya buy something that runs like garbage and can't refund.

    I have looked through threads here and online, but I'm looking for a contemporary, today's hardware, opinion.


    Thanks guys!
    Taildragger Pilot

    Keep on Flyin'

    Ryzen 5 2600
    RX 580 8GB DDR5 OC Armor
    8 GB DDR4 2400
    Dedicated SSD for Win10
    Dedicated SSD for FSX:SE

  2. #2
    What do you mean they "discontinued" it ?
    Their Lear 25 is still on sale on their website: http://xtremeprototypes.com/en/produ...25_se_v2r1.asp

    The only other option I know about is the Lear 35 by Flysimware, which also got very good reviews.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by PilatusTurbo View Post
    I'm looking for a light jet, like a Lear 23-25. I know Xtreme has discontinued the 20 series, but PC Aviator still has it. I want the old retro steam gauges, and the Franz Lear 23 just uses the default 45 cockpit.

    Anyone have these ships, the Lear 20 series? How are they optimized and on frames and what not? I'm about to purchase them, I just hate when ya buy something that runs like garbage and can't refund.

    I have looked through threads here and online, but I'm looking for a contemporary, today's hardware, opinion.


    Thanks guys!
    Try the Lear 24 from Lionheart Creations. I have it and it is quite nice. (I too am a fan of round dials, and their panel is full of 'em!!) If you're not looking for a Lear specifically, you could try the DH125 from Rob's Aero Files or the Piaggio/Douglas PD808. (The 808 is a bit of an odd bird, but I like it. A Douglas project that was sold to Piaggio.) The author's name escapes me right at the moment though but a Google search should find it for you.)

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Josh Patterson View Post
    Piaggio/Douglas PD808. (The 808 is a bit of an odd bird, but I like it. A Douglas project that was sold to Piaggio.) The author's name escapes me right at the moment though but a Google search should find it for you.)
    http://www.mariopilot.heliohost.org/...mid=53&lang=en


    A great and pretty complex aircraft.

  5. #5
    members+
    Fighter Fanatic
    PilatusTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Age
    38
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by Daube View Post
    What do you mean they "discontinued" it ?
    Their Lear 25 is still on sale on their website: http://xtremeprototypes.com/en/produ...25_se_v2r1.asp

    The only other option I know about is the Lear 35 by Flysimware, which also got very good reviews.
    Yes, I know their 25, specifically is still available. I was asking about their Lear 20 Series package, which is no longer available from them, directly. Not intersted in just the 25, nor for $50 (Yes, I get it, that's now a 'reasonable' price for payware these days-not doing it ). I also really have my heart set on a 23 or 24.

    I'll check out Lionheart's again. How is it on performance and optimization?

    That's the main question I want from your guys' experiences; which of these are frame rate friendly, more so than another.

    I'll check it out, Bjoern. Thanks guys
    Taildragger Pilot

    Keep on Flyin'

    Ryzen 5 2600
    RX 580 8GB DDR5 OC Armor
    8 GB DDR4 2400
    Dedicated SSD for Win10
    Dedicated SSD for FSX:SE

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by PilatusTurbo View Post
    Yes, I know their 25, specifically is still available. I was asking about their Lear 20 Series package, which is no longer available from them, directly. Not intersted in just the 25, nor for $50 (Yes, I get it, that's now a 'reasonable' price for payware these days-not doing it ). I also really have my heart set on a 23 or 24.

    I'll check out Lionheart's again. How is it on performance and optimization?

    That's the main question I want from your guys' experiences; which of these are frame rate friendly, more so than another.

    I'll check it out, Bjoern. Thanks guys
    Lionheart's performance of the plane, or its impact on the sim? The aircraft performance is what I would expect from an older jet. Spirited, but not blistering and you have the option for full manual operation as just about every switch in the VC works. As for how it is on the sim, I have an extremely modest setup and I don't get any FPS issues with my most of my sliders set at 50%. For $35 I don't think you would be disappointed.

  7. #7
    I don't own any of these planes, then I cannot speak about their performance.
    I have read a lot of feedbacks regarding the XTrem Prototypes Lear 25 and the FlySimWare Lear 35, and both were excellent on the feature and realism point of view, but I don't know anything about their impact on the FPS.

    Regarding Lionheart Lear 24, I would be cautious. If I remember correctly, this plane is the reason why the creator of this plane left this forum. People made some comments regarding the exterior model, more specifically the front/cockpit/nose sections which looked nothing like the real Lear 24 (proportions were totally wrong, front windows were too big etc...), and instead of acknowledging the problem, he got upset and left. I don't know if he has rectified the 3D model yet, but I personally excluded him from my possible payware choices at that moment.
    That was a long time ago though. Maybe, in the meanwhile he has rectified everything and his model is now a very nice one, I don't know. I didn't check at all.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by PilatusTurbo View Post
    I'm looking for a light jet, like a Lear 23-25. I know Xtreme has discontinued the 20 series, but PC Aviator still has it. I want the old retro steam gauges, and the Franz Lear 23 just uses the default 45 cockpit.
    I've got both the Xtreme Prototypes pack and the Franz Luftfahrt packages, haven't flow either in a couple of years though... no reflection on the models I just don't really fire up FSX that often these days. I may or may not have swapped the default L45 cockpit of the FL for the EP L24's cockpit, can't remember really, certainly planned to though. Much like yourself I prefer the older steam driven Lears to the glass cockpit variants.

    I don't recall any particular performance issues with either model and I'm running on what can now only be described as an antique. I built this machine when I started university, and graduated 5 years ago... bit of a beast in its day but that was 9 years ago .

    I'll try and do a test flight of both either tonight or tomorrow and report back, as I said though I'm pretty sure they were both fine performance wise.
    "Thou shalt maintain thine airspeed lest the ground shalt rise up and smite thee"

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Daube View Post
    I don't own any of these planes, then I cannot speak about their performance.
    I have read a lot of feedbacks regarding the XTrem Prototypes Lear 25 and the FlySimWare Lear 35, and both were excellent on the feature and realism point of view, but I don't know anything about their impact on the FPS.

    Regarding Lionheart Lear 24, I would be cautious. If I remember correctly, this plane is the reason why the creator of this plane left this forum. People made some comments regarding the exterior model, more specifically the front/cockpit/nose sections which looked nothing like the real Lear 24 (proportions were totally wrong, front windows were too big etc...), and instead of acknowledging the problem, he got upset and left. I don't know if he has rectified the 3D model yet, but I personally excluded him from my possible payware choices at that moment.
    That was a long time ago though. Maybe, in the meanwhile he has rectified everything and his model is now a very nice one, I don't know. I didn't check at all.
    A lot of those who criticised Bill's Learjet had never been up close to one in their life.

    just my 2 cents

    Ttfn

    Pete

  10. #10
    As far as I know, Bill modified the nose section of his Learjet for an update.

  11. #11
    members+
    Fighter Fanatic
    PilatusTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Age
    38
    Posts
    417
    Ended up buying the Xtreme Lear 20 Series. The textures were a bit wonky, just to me, not bad (their repaint kit had the fuselage DDS upside down; couldn't get it to map correctly until I figured out I had to invert it). It's actually quite frame rate friendly, and the panel textures are a little fuzzy, but legible. I'm gonna actually get the manual out and learn to start a jet. Never did the serious stuff outside of piston and turbocharged piston planes.

    I also can't stand non N tail numbers, so I'm in the process of learning to repaint. Got DXTBmp, and Paint.net... I created my FIRST EVER repaint last night. Not too much to write home about, but I was quite proud of the small work. I've never gone beyond simple panel and aircraft cfg modifications; I tried learning repainting years and years ago and couldn't figure Gimp out. All I did was lighten their dark dark lines and rivets and make one stripe yellow, and add my tail number. xD

    I wish Xtreme's repaint kit was a bit more blank, and had the option for the super dark or regular panel lines with rivets, but it's nothing a hue modification to the base layer can't fix. They also included the body stripes as a base layer paint. Not sure why...

    I'm not sure how far I'll get into repainting, as it would be super fun, but HOLY learning curve to it. I can barely add a layer or two and move them around, let alone mess with bump mapping layers or whatever. I've googled the tutorials to death, but now I'm gonna focus on Paint.net and learning its interface. I'm just happy I can add a custom tail number... Don't know how to remove the old one, yet, but I'll get there.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 20190720124036_1.jpg  
    Taildragger Pilot

    Keep on Flyin'

    Ryzen 5 2600
    RX 580 8GB DDR5 OC Armor
    8 GB DDR4 2400
    Dedicated SSD for Win10
    Dedicated SSD for FSX:SE

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Motormouse View Post
    A lot of those who criticised Bill's Learjet had never been up close to one in their life.

    just my 2 cents

    Ttfn

    Pete
    You are right, a lot of them never ever got close to a real Lear24.
    However, 100% of these guys compared his model to real life pictures of Lear 24 planes, and it was very obvious to everybody that the model didn't look right AT ALL.
    It doesn't matter if you get to see a plane in real. I never saw a real Tomcat in my life, but if somebody makes a Tomcat model that looks completely wrong, I'll notice it anyways.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by PilatusTurbo View Post
    Ended up buying the Xtreme Lear 20 Series. The textures were a bit wonky, just to me, not bad (their repaint kit had the fuselage DDS upside down; couldn't get it to map correctly until I figured out I had to invert it). It's actually quite frame rate friendly, and the panel textures are a little fuzzy, but legible. I'm gonna actually get the manual out and learn to start a jet. Never did the serious stuff outside of piston and turbocharged piston planes.

    I also can't stand non N tail numbers, so I'm in the process of learning to repaint. Got DXTBmp, and Paint.net... I created my FIRST EVER repaint last night. Not too much to write home about, but I was quite proud of the small work. I've never gone beyond simple panel and aircraft cfg modifications; I tried learning repainting years and years ago and couldn't figure Gimp out. All I did was lighten their dark dark lines and rivets and make one stripe yellow, and add my tail number. xD

    I wish Xtreme's repaint kit was a bit more blank, and had the option for the super dark or regular panel lines with rivets, but it's nothing a hue modification to the base layer can't fix. They also included the body stripes as a base layer paint. Not sure why...

    I'm not sure how far I'll get into repainting, as it would be super fun, but HOLY learning curve to it. I can barely add a layer or two and move them around, let alone mess with bump mapping layers or whatever. I've googled the tutorials to death, but now I'm gonna focus on Paint.net and learning its interface. I'm just happy I can add a custom tail number... Don't know how to remove the old one, yet, but I'll get there.
    Have you checked the FlySimWare forums (at avsim) where the new textures for the Lear35 are being worked on, with PBR and all ? It looks very good, honnestly.

  14. #14
    members+
    Fighter Fanatic
    PilatusTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Age
    38
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by Daube View Post
    Have you checked the FlySimWare forums (at avsim) where the new textures for the Lear35 are being worked on, with PBR and all ? It looks very good, honnestly.
    Lear 35? I saw their model, and although nice, I'm just not into any bigger than the 25. I want the smaller small of corporate jets. Was looking at VLJs but anything from Carenado, jet wise, kills my FPS. I really wanted their Citation 550, but I've seen frame rates on their complex, glass cockpit aircraft. Not good even on my modestly powerful rig.

    I know there are freeware and my old Eaglesoft Citation, which I still have, but it's no longer up to modern snuff, sadly.

    This Xtreme Lear 20 series is just above those in terms of quality, where I can use my imagination for the rest. I didn't realize the private jet market for FS was so small. Figured it would be enormous.
    Taildragger Pilot

    Keep on Flyin'

    Ryzen 5 2600
    RX 580 8GB DDR5 OC Armor
    8 GB DDR4 2400
    Dedicated SSD for Win10
    Dedicated SSD for FSX:SE

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by PilatusTurbo View Post
    I'm looking for a light jet, like a Lear 23-25. I know Xtreme has discontinued the 20 series, but PC Aviator still has it. I want the old retro steam gauges, and the Franz Lear 23 just uses the default 45 cockpit.

    Anyone have these ships, the Lear 20 series? How are they optimized and on frames and what not? I'm about to purchase them, I just hate when ya buy something that runs like garbage and can't refund.

    I have looked through threads here and online, but I'm looking for a contemporary, today's hardware, opinion.


    Thanks guys!
    I know you're looking for baby Lears but I'd seriously consider the LJ35 from Flysimware. They are nearly wrapping up a massive visual update to the aircraft. It looks incredible. Follow this thread: https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/5...exture-update/
    Sometimes you can find the Lear on sale too...
    FAA ZMP
    PPL ASEL

    | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | EVGA GTX1080 Ti | 32GB 5600 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X |

  16. #16
    members+
    Fighter Fanatic
    PilatusTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Age
    38
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanbatc View Post
    I know you're looking for baby Lears but I'd seriously consider the LJ35 from Flysimware. They are nearly wrapping up a massive visual update to the aircraft. It looks incredible. Follow this thread: https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/5...exture-update/
    Sometimes you can find the Lear on sale too...
    WOW. I didn't know 35's had the iconic tip tanks. Major reason I was after these 'baby lears' as you say. I am going to have to consider this seriously, now. I've actually taken the time, another first, to read and understand the checklists for a jet in FS. I can actually start this ship from cold and dark; always used to use the good ol' CTRL+E for anything without propellers and pistons. Very very cool. It's also nice that the cockpit layout is almost identical.

    However, how is the Flysimware 35 on FPS? I know it may be hard to speculate about this update, but man that does look nice. If it performs like the Xtreme 20 series, I'm in.
    Taildragger Pilot

    Keep on Flyin'

    Ryzen 5 2600
    RX 580 8GB DDR5 OC Armor
    8 GB DDR4 2400
    Dedicated SSD for Win10
    Dedicated SSD for FSX:SE

  17. #17
    I love FlySimWare, they put a lot of attention and small details/features in their planes.
    However, you are right to be careful about the performance. I have only their Mu-2, which I love, but it was a bit heavy on the FPS on my previous computer. I cannot tell about the Lear 35, because I don't own it, but maybe somebody else will reply.
    What is your current hardware ?

    In any case, I strongly advise you to wait for some sales if you want to buy that plane. FlySimWare sometimes does some very nice price reduction, ranging from 30% to 50% if I remember correctly. Since you have already got the Lear 20 series, you have something to help you waiting anyways

  18. #18
    members+
    Fighter Fanatic
    PilatusTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Age
    38
    Posts
    417
    I agree, Daube. I'll get better at fine tuning my paint for this ship, and make it my own. I found that you can't change the ATC ID or tailnumber in this aircraft's config. Some models have it coded in, and this seems to be one of them. I don't mind manually changing it before flying, now that I know that's the only way to do it.

    As far as having something nice while I wait, I'm quite happy with it. I'm learning to do new stuff in FS I never have before. I've never seriously attempted to realistically fly a turbine aircraft. I'm now attempting to do it, with this, and it's SUPER fun. I'm gonna move onto the ILS lessons in the sim, and begin reading up on Turbine engine management, so I understand more than just what the gauges show me.

    I flew her back from Telluride, to my hometown of Phoenix, last night. Stopped in Winslow for fuel and a real bathroom break. I didn't really need to, but getting below 2,000 lbs fuel made me a little edgy. Started her back up after fuel services took care of it, and taxied out during sunset, and made way back to Phoenix. Landing is more challenging, but I'm learning a more precision, trimmed approach; let the plane do the work. Sorry for my 87,000 screenshots. I wanted to share the maiden voyage and first flights, it was super fun and memorable. Not a bad little ship, at all.

    This aircraft is teaching me to refine, and slow down my flying, and be more proactive and planned. It's quite fun. I'm beginning to see the other side of what all the tubeliner guys like so much. Still gonna fly my GA Piston fleet mostly, but this is a great intermediate range jumper.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 20190720222348_1.jpg   20190720222407_1.jpg   20190720223123_1.jpg   20190720224146_1.jpg   20190720231429_1.jpg   20190720232100_1.jpg  

    20190720234122_1.jpg   20190720235245_1.jpg   20190721000125_1.jpg   20190721001741_1.jpg   20190721001901_1.jpg   20190721002443_1.jpg  

    Taildragger Pilot

    Keep on Flyin'

    Ryzen 5 2600
    RX 580 8GB DDR5 OC Armor
    8 GB DDR4 2400
    Dedicated SSD for Win10
    Dedicated SSD for FSX:SE

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by PilatusTurbo View Post
    Lear 35? I saw their model, and although nice, I'm just not into any bigger than the 25.
    A 35 is basically a re-engined 25.



    Quote Originally Posted by PilatusTurbo View Post
    However, how is the Flysimware 35 on FPS? I know it may be hard to speculate about this update, but man that does look nice. If it performs like the Xtreme 20 series, I'm in.
    I was very sensitive about FPS in FSX and the LJ35 performed well. It's no default 172, but FPS required no slider reduction BS.

    VAS consumption was a bit of an issue with all the 3D stuff in the cockpit, but texture resolution reductions and/or conversion into DXT1 format improved matters.

Members who have read this thread: 2

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •