1X 2080Ti vs. 2X 2080Ti vs. 1X TitanXP - P3D V4.3
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 1X 2080Ti vs. 2X 2080Ti vs. 1X TitanXP - P3D V4.3

  1. #1

    Lightbulb 1X 2080Ti vs. 2X 2080Ti vs. 1X TitanXP - P3D V4.3

    Rob Ainscough over at Avsim has tested P3D v.4.3 with 1X 2080Ti vs. 2X 2080Ti vs. 1X TitanXP.

    https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/5...tanxp-p3d-v43/



    "Time is God's way of keeping everything from happening at once"





  2. #2
    From my interpretation, he was CPU bottlenecked almost all the way up to very high and was hitting CPU temperatures where it would have to start thermal throttling (99+).

    Take these results with a grain of salt.

    (I feel sorry for that i7).

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Stefano Zibell View Post
    From my interpretation, he was CPU bottlenecked almost all the way up to very high and was hitting CPU temperatures where it would have to start thermal throttling (99+).

    Take these results with a grain of salt.

    (I feel sorry for that i7).

    I noticed that too. But not just that, the single 2080Ti was running hotter then the SLI config and that the 2 card was hotter then the top
    card. He also did all this testing in 4K, I'd like to see the results for 1080p and 1440 (2K) as most people are still running 1080p monitors.

    On a side note that was not an I7 cpu, he has an I9 7900x and using an x299 motherboard.

    Joe
    I7 6700K @ 4.8 / Gigabyte Z170X UD3 / 16GB G.Skill TridentZ 3200mhz / EVGA GTX 1070 Ti FTW Ultra 8GB / EVGA SuperNova 750 G2
    Samsung 960 Evo NVMe M.2 250gb Boot Drive / 960 Evo 1 TB SSD - Game Drive / WD Blue 500GB SSD - Sim Drive / WD Black 1TB HD
    Fractal Design Celsius S36 AIO Cooler / Fractal Design Define R6 / LG
    32GK850G-B 32" 1440P 144Hz G-Sync Monitor

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Butcherbird17 View Post
    I noticed that too. But not just that, the single 2080Ti was running hotter then the SLI config and that the 2 card was hotter then the top
    card. He also did all this testing in 4K, I'd like to see the results for 1080p and 1440 (2K) as most people are still running 1080p monitors.

    On a side note that was not an I7 cpu, he has an I9 7900x and using an x299 motherboard.

    Joe
    I stand corrected, indeed an i9, and I am even more sorry for it. Thought I saw 7700k.

  5. #5
    Rob will be testing a new setup using these parts...

    He says the i9-9900K is cheap for $530... I guess so comparing the price of a i9-7900K.

    i9-9900K
    ASUS ROG Maximus XI Formula Z390
    G.Skill 4400 DDR CL18



    "Time is God's way of keeping everything from happening at once"





  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by TuFun View Post
    Rob will be testing a new setup using these parts...

    He says the i9-9900K is cheap for $530... I guess so comparing the price of a i9-7900K.

    i9-9900K
    ASUS ROG Maximus XI Formula Z390
    G.Skill 4400 DDR CL18
    Yeah that's the pre-order price as Intel just announced the cpu's yesterday and will be the only one that will have hyperthreading.
    If you don't want to spend that kinda coin on Intel, you can get the AMD Ryzen 2700x and a good motherboard for the same price.
    They both are 8 core 16 thread cpu's, the only difference is the Intel chip clocks higher.


    Joe
    I7 6700K @ 4.8 / Gigabyte Z170X UD3 / 16GB G.Skill TridentZ 3200mhz / EVGA GTX 1070 Ti FTW Ultra 8GB / EVGA SuperNova 750 G2
    Samsung 960 Evo NVMe M.2 250gb Boot Drive / 960 Evo 1 TB SSD - Game Drive / WD Blue 500GB SSD - Sim Drive / WD Black 1TB HD
    Fractal Design Celsius S36 AIO Cooler / Fractal Design Define R6 / LG
    32GK850G-B 32" 1440P 144Hz G-Sync Monitor

  7. #7
    Finally :

    Webmaster of yoyosims.pl.

    Win 10 64, i9 13900 KF, RTX 4090 24Gb, RAM64Gb, SSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5 [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

  8. #8


    1080Ti vs 2080Ti.

    Futuremark - 3DMark, G-sync ON.

    FireStrike.

    +7%, graphic score +16%. Not many



    TimeSpy

    +28%, graphic score +39% (not bad!).



    Nice temperatures:



    DCS - 80-90 fps vs 90-125 fps. Here is nice for me it was near +15-25 fps more.
    IL-2 - small difference 110-130 fps, from now 120-144
    P3Dv4 - very small impact 5-8 fps (for examlpe 60-65, from now is 65-73 the same location) but noticed less stutter in all the time (perhaps better GDDR6 RAM).

    2 cents from my side. The best results has DCS, the worse P3Dv4.3
    Webmaster of yoyosims.pl.

    Win 10 64, i9 13900 KF, RTX 4090 24Gb, RAM64Gb, SSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5 [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

Members who have read this thread: 0

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •