First lets get some prejudices out front. I only now use FSX-A on a WIN764 system but I have tried I think every previous iteration of the MS Sim program and before and even recently Googles foray into simulation via Google Earth. I have tried a couple of others but I also have been around computer systems long enough to manage non MS operating systems such as Linux and Unix but alas they have never had anyone build a good sim for those platforms.
Over the past 12 months my system or FSX configuration has remained unaltered and is basically near enough to what MS though out of the box it should be on setup (That is actually a smart tool of MS's built into the setup program that everyone ignores but is basically spot on). My major PC limitation is video card or GPU capacity and 32 bit processing. That said FSX runs smoothly, I have no CTD's, good inter connectivity to Internet addons such as WX and can run other programs (a few) simultaneously at the same time if I so choose and do (I will watch a video or listen to some music on a long overwater flight).
Two things have really made FSX standup and amaze me - the first is the arrival of high quality FSX only flight models or addons. Some are just masterpieces, freeware and paywar. The second is the build up of high quality texture collections for skies, land and oceans with accurate coastline and elevation rendition. Add in quality addons such as trees etc to properly config environments and you have a scenic experience at most normal fight altitudes as close to the real thing as is possible. So the simulated flight environment is now to my mind stunning. I can go anywhere in the world and fly about the area and look at geographic features that once were bland or non existent in sim programs. I can do this in simulated replication of a variety of aeroplanes covering effectively the history of flight from the beginnings to the present. A well made VC and care and attention to the flight model or dynamics files does wonders for this experience - what is on the dials is what you would get out of the real aeroplane, the numbers are right.
I would say that FSX has reached its potential and it is frankly very very good, it can only be bettered when a program comes up that allows you to overlay a 5Star FSX flight model on google earth and you do it via 3D/AI Goggles. That will be something but you are going to need a heap of graphics grunt to do that, not on my box. Yes as a program it can get a little clunky now and then but then it is after all MS, you get your lumps with your sugar.
So agree or disagree matters not, I think FSX can achieve the level it was capable of and it is frankly an amazing experience. One day it will stop working then I will think of a replacement.
Bookmarks