Soviet SWATH Aviation Cruiser, revisited
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Soviet SWATH Aviation Cruiser, revisited

  1. #1
    Members +
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    1,461
    Blog Entries
    1

    Soviet SWATH Aviation Cruiser, revisited

    Attachment 54631Attachment 54632Attachment 54633Attachment 54634

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=0By...XFveXZBWmd4elE

    Something to bounce Yaks off


    Soviet SWATH large anti-submarine aviation cruiser.
    From a 2 inch jpg of a builders model, Ca 1985.

    Revisited this early attempt- full hull, re built mesh,
    textured blahblahblah, CIMOGT's ship door and elevator gauge
    actuated hangar doors, see hangar door gauge file and read me for installation
    procedure.

    Codded effects, hunting for a way to put a condition on those to shut 'em down on
    stop, might have to do a custom effect set.
    Alpha pass, more fiddling with paint and details yet, much better than the original.

    P3D users may have to rename a compatible effect to the ships FSX effects names

    stack gass- heat blurry and SWATH smoke
    bow- NSD 1134 bow. stern NSD stern 34
    wake- wake NSD 61

    see effects folder


    Big bravo zulu to CIMOGT for the way cool animation code and xml gauge.


    stack gass- heat blurry and SWATH smoke
    bow- NSD 1134 bow. stern NSD stern 34
    wake- wake NSD 61

  2. #2
    Haha,
    thank you so much!



    BTW,
    have you seen TMAS? The kit to add Tacpack weapons to any existing ship!
    www.isoliti4gatti.it
    Corrado

  3. #3
    Members +
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    1,461
    Blog Entries
    1
    Cheers.Thought that was a more...soviet...than looking for props and rotors...
    Found another Delfin study, a single jpg. again, this for a Triton type out-rigger canoe type SWATH, and a very sexy looking LPD- like a Slava crossed with a Wasp.

  4. #4
    Interesting concept indeed. Really love the Russians outside the box of thinking regarding war machine design. Thanks for posting and sharing.
    ....my other Stryker is a 2019 Challenger Hellcat Redeye.....

    Matt

  5. #5
    Nice design. Shame we don't have US Amphibs using this modern design... maybe because it makes sense.

  6. #6
    Members +
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    1,461
    Blog Entries
    1
    It's got problems. Size and displacement is limited by the torsional rigidity of the cross deck, and seakeeping of a large swath design runs afoul of cross-deck slamming loads in a seaway. It also severely limits hull volume below the metacentric height of the ship, and it's a real beast to get space for uptakes and changing engines due to the limited width of the vertical hull members. Flooding and damage control is very problematic in a swath ship- you can't counter flood easily if you get a hole in it. Looking at this one, they've had to put a pretty small hangar topsides as the engine modules look to be under the island and ate up volume in the cross deck. For a small escort/ASW design, it might work, but there's just no way to get a bigger hangar without sacrificing maintainability and volume for gas and stores. A welldeck is pretty much out of the question. The model of the ship also showed a great deal of optimism about the volume required by structural members to keep the thing together. I couldn't make the back of the envelope calculations work with the proportions hinted at, so the crossdeck got thicker to make the load calculations work and yield sufficient volume for the Ship Crapp.
    But it does look cool.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by lazarus View Post
    It's got problems. Size and displacement is limited by the torsional rigidity of the cross deck, and seakeeping of a large swath design runs afoul of cross-deck slamming loads in a seaway. It also severely limits hull volume below the metacentric height of the ship, and it's a real beast to get space for uptakes and changing engines due to the limited width of the vertical hull members. Flooding and damage control is very problematic in a swath ship- you can't counter flood easily if you get a hole in it. Looking at this one, they've had to put a pretty small hangar topsides as the engine modules look to be under the island and ate up volume in the cross deck. For a small escort/ASW design, it might work, but there's just no way to get a bigger hangar without sacrificing maintainability and volume for gas and stores. A welldeck is pretty much out of the question. The model of the ship also showed a great deal of optimism about the volume required by structural members to keep the thing together. I couldn't make the back of the envelope calculations work with the proportions hinted at, so the crossdeck got thicker to make the load calculations work and yield sufficient volume for the Ship Crapp.
    But it does look cool.
    Thanks Lazarus.

  8. #8
    Members +
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    1,461
    Blog Entries
    1
    Probably more than anyone wants to know about swath ship naval architecture!

Members who have read this thread: 0

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •