October 12th, 2014, 12:05
Sometimes I'm slow to figure things out, so it just might be my slowness....but for the sake of argument, let's say that:
1. The guy selling them didn't take the screenshots
2. The guy selling them didn't do the altering of the background in the screenshots
3. They are clearly traceable to other people....
Now what? What is the "desired end state" in this thread if the guy is breaking all of the rules? Is the remedy to sue the guy for infringement of copyright? If so, who would sue him? Where would they get the tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees needed to do that? Are there actually people on this board willing to risk losing large amounts of personal capital to sue the guy over screenshots?
I understand being irritated about it, but I guess my real question is,...