Tab Content
  • JoeW's Avatar
    May 20th, 2013, 14:34
    Paul ...... This is a great plane I really like the way it flies. But ........... I have one problem... I can't get the gear to roll up. Am I supposed to unlock it or something? Thanks for the great plane. Yes I did read the read_me.
    18 replies | 1233 view(s)
  • txnetcop's Avatar
    May 19th, 2013, 18:30
    Once again...a real winner!!! Thanks Paul:salute: Ted
    18 replies | 1233 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 18th, 2013, 12:01
    Here's the text file. Three categories, Amphib, Skis, Wheels and Tundra tires.
    4 replies | 475 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 17th, 2013, 17:30
    Certainly, check your PM....although I must warn you I was crazy for Beaver for a while and am no longer sure what was original and what I've added....
    4 replies | 475 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 17th, 2013, 17:06
    Believe this is all true...although the "delegation" piece may not be TOTALLY accurate. There are plans where forces can act without direct verbal approval, however that generally implies a certain set of conditions...i.e. "If this, then this" (takes you back to programming with Basic doesn't it?). So, the Executive can stipulate conditions where a military option may be exercised given a certain circumstance. Now, is that delegation? Sort of depends on how you view it. Now, if you're freaking out over the seemingly overwhelming authority of the Executive Branch of the U.S....you can relax a bit. There is the Legislative Branch to consider. They do not have the authority to execute foreign policy, that belongs to the Executive....but the Legislative Branch owns the pocket book and through the so called "power of the purse" halt any military operation it wants by de-funding it, or any portion of the Federal Budget. Does not necessarily have to be military spending either. Lots of Americans believe only Congress can authorize the use of military power...that is categorically false. Only Congress can declare War, but there's no reference to any military action short of war. As a result the legislative branch proposed, and passed over presidential veto, the "War Powers Act" which essentially limited all military operations to 60 days, with an additional 30 days after the formal notification of Congress. Frankly, this joint resolution from Congress is dead in the water since it has never been used, nor is there any real teeth in it. The teeth is in the funding, which was already in place prior to the Act....so, sort of a feel good piece, with not much muscle. There is another option ....the legislative branch could enact a joint resolution (assuming with enough votes to override an executive branch veto) to prevent any operation or halt it by making it against the law to proceed. This assumes they can rustle up the votes of course. This has been done. When the North Vietnamese government violated their treaty obligation and invaded the former South Viet Nam in 1975, a joint resolution from Congress prevented President Ford from taking any action to intervene. I remember this very specifically because my father, a two tour veteran of the Viet Nam war, spent the evening crying.
    3 replies | 214 view(s)
  • txnetcop's Avatar
    May 16th, 2013, 19:18
    Outstanding service to God and your work Bill!:salute: Ted
    13 replies | 515 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 16th, 2013, 17:26
    Depends on the context because there's a legal jurisdiction application, and a Military Authority Application. I'm going to assume you mean the latter since the Benghazi story is in the news and there's lots of chatter. To get to this issue we need to step back a bit...and please, do not make this a political commentary, it's just how the United States does stuff, no matter who's in charge. First off, no member of the U.S. Military may depart the borders of the U.S. without federal authority to perform any kind of "official" duties. That authority derives from the Executive Branch and is generally executed through the SECDEF to the various service Chiefs or Joint Combatant or Functional Commands. That's regardless of whether we're talking peace or war. Now, those "authorities" take on various aspects. If for instance, you're the lucky recipient of orders to Stuttgart Germany, then those orders are your "authority" to make that move. There's lots of differing considerations that come into play before you get those orders...for one, there is a cap on the number of personnel the United States may have in Germany, generally executed through a Status of Forces Agreement, or SOFA. The United States by treaty may not exceed that cap without going to the Nation of Germany and requesting permission (sometimes this is done through the exercise planning process, through a NATO process since Germany is a member, or even through an actual personal call from the President to the Prime Minister in the case of an emergency). If the Military exceeds that cap, then the U.S. is in violation of a treaty which Congress has ratified, making the Executive branch guilty of breaking our own laws. Now, I know everyone watches a lot of movies and reads a lot of books....but the United States Defense Department does not go about violating our own countries laws on purpose, and we don't go about breaking treaties with friendly nations. Even the French.....(sorry, it was too tempting). Okay, so point is....you have your orders to proceed with the frau and all your kid to Stuttgart which is a form of "cross border authority".
    3 replies | 214 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 16th, 2013, 16:49
    TeaSea replied to a thread Gonna Build My Own in The NewsHawks
    Thanks for the link Naismeth. I have seen a couple of good tutorials but not this one. Also, for what it's worth I think I'll skip the $1299.00 Video Card.
    9 replies | 280 view(s)
  • txnetcop's Avatar
    May 15th, 2013, 19:27
    Just letting you know you did an amazing job up to this point :O) Ted
    148 replies | 8408 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 15th, 2013, 16:42
    Gaming PC..... Wife has finally insisted that I do something all my Flight Sim stuff on the office PC, so I told her I'm going to build me one....then I'll go back and upgrade this one. Here's what I'm looking at (full disclosure, I can probably afford a little more than most hobbyists could--but being a cheap bastard I intend to keep it down). ASUS Sabertooth Z77 Intel Series 7 Mother Board Intel Core i7-3770K Quad Core Processor Western Digital Blue 1TB (7200 RPM, 64MB Cache) HDD
    9 replies | 280 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 15th, 2013, 16:21
    I could be wrong but I believe Chicago (not the Beatles) has the record for being the world's most successful Rock group as measured by financial success and number of songs to make the charts. I read that somewhere anyways.....could be wrong....
    6 replies | 239 view(s)
  • txnetcop's Avatar
    May 15th, 2013, 05:23
    YEP you're right on P! I had every album they ever did...AWESOME! Ted
    6 replies | 239 view(s)
  • txnetcop's Avatar
    May 13th, 2013, 17:30
    Thanks guys and thanks especially for the review from simHQ! It looked very impressive. Ted
    8 replies | 482 view(s)
  • txnetcop's Avatar
    May 12th, 2013, 18:40
    http://www.aeroflyfs.com/screenshots.html
    8 replies | 482 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 11th, 2013, 09:55
    TeaSea replied to a thread Dear Diary in The NewsHawks
    Dear diary, i just finished laughing my ass off. These cats think they have so many problems. Let me tell you what the authorities did to my balls. Life has no meaning, and I get no joy out of licking myself. These cats are a bunch of pussies. -the dog
    5 replies | 299 view(s)
  • TeaSea's Avatar
    May 9th, 2013, 17:13
    There is a certain aesthetic quality using black and white film that really, really makes for drama in an image. Color is wonderful of course, but I'm not sure if any of Kaplans photo's would have been nearly so dramatic if they were in color. You're the photo dude Panther, what say you?
    9 replies | 289 view(s)
No More Results

2 Visitor Messages

  1. Hey

    That all sounds good except SLI

    many setups running sli are not good..FSX does not vare for that set up...BUT some do it and say its great..i had a SLI 8800GTS set up and it was awful Once I pulles a card out all was well...Worth a try though


    masoon
  2. View Conversation
    sorry i cannot remember either
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 2 of 2
About JoeW

Basic Information

Date of Birth
October 9, 1937 (75)
About JoeW
Location:
Lake Placid, Florida
Interests:
Scenery Design
Occupation:
Retired

Signature


Joe Watson
Lake Placid, Florida

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
887
Posts Per Day
0.40
Last Post
Bad Duck New Version Posted (FSX Freeware) May 20th, 2013 14:34
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
2
Most Recent Message
May 29th, 2010 06:42
General Information
Last Activity
May 20th, 2013 14:43
Join Date
April 7th, 2007

2 Friends

  1. TeaSea TeaSea is offline

    SOH-CM-2013

    TeaSea
  2. txnetcop txnetcop is offline

    SOH Staff

    txnetcop
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2


Avsim - Flightsim - SimFlight - Simviation - iflyonline - CFS IP - Quarter Moon Saloon - Com-Central