PDA

View Full Version : How long should she be in jail for this?



hey_moe
November 10th, 2012, 02:09
HAMPTON — With a stroke of a pen Friday morning, a Circuit Court judge in Hampton wiped away Jonathan Montgomery's conviction on three felony sexual assault charge — and vacated more than two years left on his prison sentence.
That came after the supposed "victim" in the case told police investigators last month said she had lied at Montgomery's 2008 trial about getting sexually assaulted outside her grandmother's home eight years earlier.
But when Montgomery's family drove out to Jarratt, Va., to pick him up at Greensville Correctional Center late Friday, the Department of Corrections told them he wasn't being released.
"My son's getting screwed," said his father, David Montgomery, of North Carolina, who was spending the night at a hotel near the prison. "They're holding an innocent man without due cause. I am going to come back to the prison tomorrow, demanding my son's release."
According to Montgomery's lawyer, Deputy Hampton Public Defender Ben Pavek, the Attorney General's Office contends that the Circuit Court judge on the case, Randolph T. West, didn't have the authority to order Montgomery's release.
That didn't sit right with Pavek, who slammed both the Department of Corrections and the Attorney General's office and said that West had authority to rule.
"This is a purely innocent man being held in custody under no legal basis whatsoever," Pavek said. "They are defying a lawful, valid court order to release an innocent man who has been held in custody based upon a total fabrication for four years."
The Department of Corrections and Attorney General's Office couldn't be reached for comment late Friday, but the Attorney General's Office has previously asserted that only higher state courts, not Circuit Courts, can order a defendant's release more than 21 days after a trial.
Going to a higher court, such as filing a "writ of actual innocence," could extend Montgomery's date of release by months, according to lawyers familiar with the process.
A false conviction
Friday had started more optimistically for the Montgomery family.
At the morning hearing, Hampton's top prosecutor, Commonwealth's Attorney Anton Bell strongly backed a motion from Pavek to throw out the conviction.
"We come here with heavy hearts," Bell said. "The chief witness in the case has perpetrated a lie and committed perjury upon this court."
At a trial in Hampton Circuit Court in June 2008, West relied primarily on the testimony of Elizabeth Paige Coast, then 17 years old, who claimed that Montgomery assaulted her outside her grandmother's house in late 2000, when Montgomery was 14 years old and she was 10.
Last month, however, the 22-year-old Coast — then a civilian information clerk at the Hampton Police Division — told a police officer that she had fabricated the allegations.
West, the same judge who found Montgomery guilty in June 2008, voiced regret for having found him guilty.
"There are very few times when this court is at a loss for words, but this is the court's worst nightmare," West said Friday. "There are no words that are adequate to say to Mr. Montgomery that this court regrets the error that has been made."
West said he couldn't give the 26-year-old Montgomery back four years of his life, and said he could understand if Montgomery couldn't accept his apology. "You will never forget this, and God knows, I will never forget it," West said.
Fabricating a lie
Bell, who was not the original trial prosecutor, told West at the hearing that Coast has been interviewed on "multiple occasions" to make sure "that her recantation is in fact true."
Coast gave a detailed explanation for the lie, telling investigators that she had been caught by her parents viewing pornographic websites in the family's home — and concocted the story of prior sexual abuse as a way of explaining why she was looking at porn, Bell said.
It was October 2007 when Coast told police that her grandmother's former neighbor named "John" had assaulted her back in 2001, when she was 10 years old and Montgomery was 14.
The girl said her attacker forced her to perform oral sex, and that the incident took place outside her grandmother's house on South Greenfield Avenue, off North Armistead Avenue. Montgomery's family had lived there when his father was stationed at Naval Station Norfolk (http://www.sim-outhouse.com/topic/unrest-conflicts-war/defense/naval-station-norfolk-PLCUL0000134.topic) as a Navy electrician.
Though she didn't remember Montgomery's last name, Coast picked him out of his high school yearbook photo.
Bell says she picked Montgomery as her attacker because she knew his family had moved away and that "she did not believe that the police would be able to track him down."
But police did track him down, finding him at his mother's home in Florida.
Based chiefly on Coast's false testimony, Montgomery was convicted of three felonies — forcible sodomy, aggravated sexual battery and object sexual penetration. He was sentenced to 45 years, with 7.5 years to serve and 37.5 years suspended.
Shortly after the trial — but before the sentence — Coast began working at the Hampton Police Division as a civilian information clerk.
Coast never backed away from her lie, until last month. In October, Coast told a Hampton police officer that she had lied at the trial. That revelation led to a joint investigation by the Hampton Police and Commonwealth's Attorney's Office.
"Imagine you're living your life in Florida, and the police show up and say seven years ago you're committing sexual acts on a minor child," Pavek said. "And you say, 'What?!' Your life is ripped from you. And it's all based on somebody just saying this. Wow. That's frightening."
Pavek said he's never had a previous case like this one. "What a bizarre thing to make up to divert attention from looking at porn web sites," he said. "She had nerve."
Correcting a wrong
At the request to throw out the charges and vacate the remaining sentence, West said on Friday: "Your motion is granted."
West seemed somewhat shaken while addressing Montgomery.
Much of what he does, he said, is assess witness character and credibility. "You look at witnesses, you look at things like eye contact, and you do what you think is right," he said.
Montgomery, seated at a table in the courtroom, didn't react much to West's ruling, but his father, mother, step-mother and sister — seated near the front of the courtroom — reacted with tears and elated sighs of relief.
"It's a miracle," his mother, Mishia Woodruff, of Panama City, Fla., said after the hearing.
"This has been my life for five years, and now this great weight has been lifted off of me," said Jonathan's father, David Montgomery, an appliance repairman and retired Navy electrician from western North Carolina.
Montgomery said he's been "consumed" with the case for five years, spending hours thinking about it, writing some of the legal briefs, and organizing numerous binders filled with every piece of paper ever filed in the case.
After the hearing, Pavek said the reason Jonathan Montgomery didn't show any emotion after West's ruling Friday was because he wants to "wait until he's physically out" to celebrate. When that celebration will take place remains to be seen.
Montgomery's family had hoped that celebration would be Friday night or the next day. After the hearing, they went to the prison, about two hours from Hampton, to wait upon Jonathan's release.
"I'm going to sleep on the doorstep until my son walks out," David Montgomery said Friday morning — before learning of the attorney general's interpretation of the judge's lack of authority.
Perjury charges
Whereas the legal proceedings could be nearing an end for Jonathan Montgomery, they are beginning anew for Elizabeth Paige Coast.
At Friday's hearing, Bell said that Coast would be arrested after the hearing and charged with perjury. Police arrested Coast — who has worked as a civilian employee at the Hampton Police Department for the past four years — at 10:30 a.m., said police spokesman Sgt. Jason Price.
She had been placed on leave without pay on Nov. 2, and she resigned effective immediately on Friday morning, Price said. Under Virginia law, perjury is a Class 5 felony, punishable by up to 10 years behind bars.
This is welcome news for the person who originally prosecuted the case.
Leslie A. Siman-Tov, who now works in private practice, said she couldn't believe it when a Hampton (http://www.sim-outhouse.com/topic/us/virginia/hampton-county/hampton-%28hampton-virginia%29-PLGEO100101154030000.topic) prosecutor recently called her to ask her about the case. She said that if Coast indeed concocted the story, "they need to charge her."

hey_moe
November 10th, 2012, 02:11
BTW, I did a copy and paste of this story from our local paper this morning because some of our members said they were unable to view some of the stories because they were trying to charge a fee for viewing.

rayrey10
November 10th, 2012, 03:29
She should at least get the time he was sentenced for the crime he didn't commit. That same thing has happened down here twice in the last 5 or 6 years. Luckily in both cases the accusers have confessed before the poor bastards that went to jail for a crime they didn't commit.

stansdds
November 10th, 2012, 04:57
How do you repay for destroying another person's life? A year in jail? Five years in jail? Ten years in jail? A good attorney might be able to make the claim that she has mental issues and she gets psych treatment in a hospital as a sentence. There is no way possible for someone to adequately compensate for perjury in a felony conviction.

SSI01
November 10th, 2012, 07:12
How interesting this subject came up this morning - I just finished writing another publication about precisely the same thing.

I'm retired from 23 years in a Federal military law enforcement organization. I spent 16 of those years in the field, 7 at HQ reviewing cases and ops. In those 23 years I saw more than my share of sexual assault complaints. I kid you not, we would have to roll out at 230AM after some young lady would talk with a friend in some bar about some past sexual escapade, and the friend would tell her she had been raped, so our victim would go to the base cops and say, "I think I was raped 6 months ago," the duty agent would get called and we'd have to go in. I saw dozens and dozens of cases like this. They were always given top priority in our offices due to the potentially explosive nature of the accusations. We had to drop assaults, arsons, agg assaults, burglaries, child abuse, larceny of autos, theft of govt property, etc and turn out all hands to handle various aspects of the investigation. I recall exactly one - one - case in 16 years where there was a bona fide sexual assault. I saw plenty of cases where both parties were blasted and engaged in sexual intercourse, only for her to get sober and realize what she had done and lodge a complaint. I saw plenty of cases where our complainant engaged in sex with someone else who was different from her then changed her mind and said she was raped. There are plenty of other categories as well. I personally worked a case where our complainant said she had been assaulted in a building by a command member. Investigation disclosed this would have had to have happened within feet of a watch member who reported no unusual noises or incidents during his watch - in fact, complained to us only of his boredom (not realizing how lucky he was!). The subj insisted it occurred elsewhere and was consensual and further insisted on a polygraph exam. Subsequent investigation disclosed our victim had wanted to engage in sex with someone like our "subj" for a long time but her husband, a biker who hated people like our "subj," was the brake on her behavior. When she was a long way away from hubby, due to being a reservist activated for service, she indulged then had second thoughts and called us. Colossal waste of time. Investigative resources are at a premium. They shouldn't be wasted. Command almost never punishes the false complainant. These BS complaints trivialize the assaults that do occur, so the false complainants should be severely punished. Sorry to sound so abrupt to you guys - this still gets me steamed when I think of how much time I wasted handling this trash.

stansdds
November 10th, 2012, 08:28
And therein lay the problem. All too often there is no punishment for making false accusations.

SSI01
November 10th, 2012, 09:16
stansdds - you wanna hear the best one - I recall one I handled at a naval station outside of Chicago, IL. It occurred off-base (therefore it shouldn't have been our affair anyway) but the "perp" was military. The North Chicago IL police heard the complaint and immediately called us - probably laughing up their sleeves - then turned it over to us. Investigation revealed our complainant was engaged to someone who was a recently discharged service member. The "perp," still in the military, was a friend of the groom-to-be. Somehow our "victim" and the "perp" found themselves alone in the home she shared with the recently-discharged service member, who was not in the area. It had been a while since there was any amorous activity for both of them, and one thing led to another until they were totally disrobed. Bear in mind there was no violence or force of any kind employed by our "perp," nor any threats. Both were quite willing participants. He finally wanted to do a certain thing and she said he could, as long as he didn't XXXX because she was engaged to the other guy. I stopped her testimony at this point and asked her why, since he had the opportunity, he didn't use protection and she said that wasn't important to her, only that he didn't XXXX because she was engaged and for that to happen in her would in her mind constitute being unfaithful to her fiance. In other words, the physical act of sex with someone not her fiance was OK, but the inevitable end-product of that act constituted sexual assault to her. Of course, when proceedings culminated he did what his body was designed to do, and she immediately flew off the handle and called the cops. This is an example of what we wasted our time on, what would get Pat Schroeder in Colorado all fired up because it was "ignored," what would make four-star admirals and generals cringe (and still does). Like divorce proceedings, the situation is weighted very heavily in favor of the woman when their continued emancipation should make them very equal participants in almost all of these things. 23 years of experience speaking here!

glh
November 10th, 2012, 09:22
I am in agreement with Rayrey10. She should get, AT LEAST, a sentence to serve as much time behind bars as Mr. Montgomery did.

And it is now going to be interesting to see whether or not Paula Broadwell, the "lifelong high achiever" has any extenuating circumstances to declare with Dave Petraeus.

I certainly lost a lot of respect for Petraeus -- one would certainly think a 4-star general would be able to keep his zipper closed except to whiz. I wouldn't be surprised if he has a courts-martial in his future since (I believe) he was on active duty when this occurred and the Army certainly needs to demonstrate now that general officers can't get away with this behavior.

Dumb, Dave, really REALLY dumb.

SSI01
November 10th, 2012, 09:34
The complainants never think you'll dig into the details, they seem to think they just have to make a complaint and it's all administrative from there. I and another investigator solved one of these when the young lady stated something had happened at a certain location by Corps School at Great Lakes. We had the "perp" in custody and had his statement after being advised. His account differed from hers. We went to the reported scene based on her account, nothing was there. My associate and I backtracked to find "his" scene and found something suspicious under some trees between the gate and her alleged location of the deed. He and I went to have a look, and I remember my associate saying it looked like a couple of animals had been rutting - the soil and leaves and pine cones were all disturbed, his and her underwear and clothing were caught in the low-lying tree branches or on the ground beneath the tree, best of all were the liquor bottles still at the scene. None of the clothing was torn. He was just as filthy as she was, and we could see why. Turned out this one was consensual as well, they had met in a bar off-base and came back through the Corps School gate but just couldn't wait to get started, apparently.

You can see how Mark Harmon actually spends most of his time, it ain't like in the movies.

I better stop this or the moderators will yank me. Sorry, guys.

n4gix
November 10th, 2012, 11:07
Re: Mark Petraeus, one of the late-night comedians made a pithy and cogent comment about this along the lines of "Guys, take heed! If the head of the CIA can't even manage to keep something secret, what are your chances?" :isadizzy:

Naismith
November 10th, 2012, 13:11
Re: Mark Petraeus, one of the late-night comedians made a pity and cogent comment about this along the lines of "Guys, take heed! If the head of the CIA can't even manage to keep something secret, what are your chances?" :isadizzy:

That tickled me. :icon_lol:

stansdds
November 11th, 2012, 04:20
You can see how Mark Harmon actually spends most of his time, it ain't like in the movies.


Yep, and I wonder how many people have joined NCIS only to discover the "crimes" they investigate are not terrorist plots, but are the same, everyday sort of crimes investigated by local police departments?

KellyB
November 11th, 2012, 04:42
I am in agreement with Rayrey10. She should get, AT LEAST, a sentence to serve as much time behind bars as Mr. Montgomery did.

And it is now going to be interesting to see whether or not Paula Broadwell, the "lifelong high achiever" has any extenuating circumstances to declare with Dave Petraeus.

I certainly lost a lot of respect for Petraeus -- one would certainly think a 4-star general would be able to keep his zipper closed except to whiz. I wouldn't be surprised if he has a courts-martial in his future since (I believe) he was on active duty when this occurred and the Army certainly needs to demonstrate now that general officers can't get away with this behavior.

Dumb, Dave, really REALLY dumb.


But, but...What about Commander in Chief, William Jefferson Clinton? Just what penalties did he receive? UCMJ or US Code.

clmooring
November 11th, 2012, 07:18
What a terrible way to start your adult life. 4 years in prison for something you didnt do. I cant imagine being the parent of either one of these two young people. Tragic.

n4gix
November 11th, 2012, 08:56
As I just wrote as a comment here: http://wtvr.com/2012/11/10/attorney-generals-office-blocks-release-of-wrongfully-convicted-man/


This is a very tragic situation. There should have been no delay whatever in releasing your son. Let the paper pushers deal with the details on their own time, not your son who's conviction was reversed!

Actually, I think that Virginia's AG should be forced to spend some time in that cell in the place of the victim of this injustice!

SSI01
November 11th, 2012, 11:41
Yep, and I wonder how many people have joined NCIS only to discover the "crimes" they investigate are not terrorist plots, but are the same, everyday sort of crimes investigated by local police departments?

Actually, I knew I'd be doing that going through the door. Someone needs to be investigating felony-level infractions committed by USN/USMC personnel, there are plenty of cases and it's a legitimate need. USMC CID and USN MAA Force, while very good at what they are trained to do, can't handle what we did, in part because they lack statutory authority but also the education and training. That some service members commit felonies is no reflection on the services; we just need to remember they get their members from the general populace, and some bring their baggage in with them. You always go into an investigation with an open mind, remembering that although Occam's Razor usually applies, that's not always the case. What's so disheartening is when you see things like these phony sexual assaults occur, when you pass the 70% probability point "BS test" and it's really looking bogus, you've still got to pursue it to the nth degree to protect yourself politically. Our supervision/management (I had very little "leadership") was so obscenely politically correct it was sickening.

We had FCI investigations to do, white-collar crime was fun too; I had the opportunity to work Presidential security in Hawaii in 1995 (right by the President's limo, in fact), and there were what are called PSOs (Protective Service Ops) where you bodyguarded different people. There was an education! Half the time you protect them from themselves (slip & fall, taking the wrong door, walking into things) as much as you do from someone else.

I'd never do it over again though.

glh
November 12th, 2012, 08:48
But, but...What about Commander in Chief, William Jefferson Clinton? Just what penalties did he receive? UCMJ or US Code.

Bill Clinton Was an ELECTED CIVILIAN who is Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces as set forth in the Constitution. However, the Constitution DOES NOT state that he is subject to the UCMJ.

However, he was subject to impeachment and removal from office and other penalties PROVIDED THAT he was convicted of said offense(s) by the members of Congress constitutionally authorized to do so. That did not happen.
If you have a beef with the Congress because it did not, you need to write your representative.

Roadburner440
November 12th, 2012, 10:40
Yeah... These "false accusations" are certaintly something scary. What is worse is when you are in supervisory positions in the military. Then just merely trying to get females to do work they threaten you with all kinds of articles. Trying to say you are discriminating against them, etc.. The military is a VERY different place in just the 9 short years I have been in. Unfortunately most of them know that they have you over a barrel, and all it takes is 1 complaint to be filed and you are gone whether it is true or not. I know I myself anymore carry a digital recorder on me at all times at work, and I know of a Chief that carries a tape recorder on him as well for similar reasons. What I find interesting is that on the cover of the Navy Times this week they are talking about regaining discipline amongst the lower ranks. It is IMPOSSIBLE with a lot of the kindler gentler crap that has been instilled. I only see NCIS workload increasing if anything and wasting resources on non-cases as time goes on. http://www.navytimes.com/prime/2012/11/PRIME-navy-mcpon-to-chiefs-focus-on-better-discipline-111211w/ I am willing to bet that female will not spend much if any time in jail. Sad as it is some have greater rights than others instead of being "equal."

SSI01
November 12th, 2012, 17:52
Tell your Chief buddy to be sure the person he will be talking to about a possible complaint is very aware their conversation is being recorded and the other party agrees to it. Be aware by using the tape recorder he could be accused of intimidating complainants. Be sure for him to have a witness in the room (another Chief or PO - never paygrades E-1 thru E-4), same sex as the complainant if possible. Always leave the door open to avoid harassment complaints. Unless he's cleared this recorder with someone, I would recommend instead the open door/witness policy. Also tell him to keep a detailed written record of his conversation with the female, and who was present. You are absolutely correct to be extremely cautious of these events, senior NCOs now have little to no control over the more junior ranks, in particular those of the opposite sex. Many scheming, vicious and spiteful female service members out there. If one dug deeply enough into this reported spate of harassment/sexual assault complaints in the Air Force I think you'd find quite a few of the complainants weren't getting their way somehow and came up with this complaint as a means of "getting even" for a lousy evaluation or some perceived (but not factual) slight against them for some other aspect of their performance or attitude.

Roadburner440
November 13th, 2012, 12:57
He keeps his recorder on top of the desk... Is how I wound up getting one. I seen the tape going one day and asked him what it was. He said not only is it easier than keeping a written pass down log of the days events (in case a mishap, etc happens) but it is also a safe guard against false accusations. That is originally what got me to thinking about it myself, and why I now at least have my recorder with me just in case. Ironically now that I have one at hand I have never found myself truly needing it as of late (in the last year). I personally do not foresee things getting any better. As an old CO of mine used to say things usually get worse before they get better. He always used to talk about how Commands go through peaks and valleys. However I fail to see where the upside is anymore this day in age. Just seems like a never ending race in to the abyss.