PDA

View Full Version : Aerosoft F-16 Fighting Falcon Promo Video



CodyValkyrie
November 28th, 2008, 19:43
Enjoy! It is LONG overdue.

High Quality WMV Download:
http://www.jaggyroadfilms.com/movies/commercial/flightsimulator/fighting_falcon_wmv.zip

High Quality DivX Download:
http://www.jaggyroadfilms.com/movies/commercial/flightsimulator/fighting_falcon_divx.zip

SimTube:
http://www.simtube.com/video/2527/Aerosoft-F-16-Fighting-Falcon

FlightSimTube:
http://www.flightsimtube.com/video-flight_simulator_x-94016-aerosoft_f16_fighting_falcon

VIMEO:
http://www.vimeo.com/2375220

YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xzeyKJC5bI

Regards,
-Cody Bergland

<object width="425" height="344">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0xzeyKJC5bI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>

JorisVandenBerghe
November 29th, 2008, 03:33
Lovely video...haven't tried the AI refuelling option, actually. I love the shot when the Viper breaks away from the A321...(2:42)!

CodyValkyrie
November 29th, 2008, 09:35
That is one of my favorite shots too. Refueling from planes is a bit tricky, but there should be instructions on the forum.

jmig
November 29th, 2008, 12:42
Outstanding video Cody. It is really well done and shows off the capabilities of the plane very well.

EgoR64
November 29th, 2008, 13:14
:applause::applause: Niiiiiccccceeeee !! Love the Falcon & Vid !!

Great Job !!

Many Cheers !!:ernae:

ryanbatc
November 29th, 2008, 19:22
How is the performance with this plane? Is it comparable to the LevelD 767? I only ask because the MDL file is huge! And I wondered how it would work for me.

A few comparisons on my system:

Default C172 VC: 40FPS
RealAir SF260 VC: 32 FPS
LevelD767 VC: 25FPS
Eaglesoft SR22 VC: 20FPS

CodyValkyrie
November 29th, 2008, 23:11
I would say it would perform better than the Level-D. For me it runs very smoothly. In those canyon shots I was getting around 70FPS or so. They somehow, with all those polygons managed to keep it running pretty well. I have no complaints of FPS.

Someone else here should speak up though.

jmig
November 30th, 2008, 05:14
How is the performance with this plane? Is it comparable to the LevelD 767? I only ask because the MDL file is huge! And I wondered how it would work for me.

A few comparisons on my system:

Default C172 VC: 40FPS
RealAir SF260 VC: 32 FPS
LevelD767 VC: 25FPS
Eaglesoft SR22 VC: 20FPS

I find it runs smoothly. I run three monitors through a TH2Go and average high teens, which is fine for me.

BTW - High teens to low 20's is average for me. I have FSX FPS set at a max of 25.

CodyValkyrie
November 30th, 2008, 13:31
Yes, I think most people find it highly reasonable.

dswo
November 30th, 2008, 13:51
"Framerates are good, considering..." I think that's the consensus. On my rig (stock Q6600, Nvidia 8800GT, WinXP and 4 Gb RAM) the Acceleration Hornet is noticeably smoother. But the Aerosoft Falcon has much more detail, and a collimated HUD.