Ken Stallings
March 20th, 2010, 18:13
If the title of this thread sounds preposterous, then welcome to my club!
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2010/03/airforce_morrill_032010w/
If I had not read this in Air Force Times I would have sworn it was a National Enquirer or The Onion story!
My initial reaction before reading the whole story was the General must have been dating someone in violation of the rules against fraternization. If that had been the case, I would have agreed with the administrative action -- possibly even thought he got off light.
But, in fact, he was dating a civlian, who was totally unaffiliated with the Department of Defense! Furthermore, he was legally separated from his wife at the time!
I swear this is a new low and we were just discussing the outrageous punishment for those Navy pilots. But, this is absolutely puritanical! You cannot demote an officer and force him to retire simply because he dated while separated legally from his wife. This is just too much!
What in the hell has gone wrong with my military!!!
Ken
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2010/03/airforce_morrill_032010w/
If I had not read this in Air Force Times I would have sworn it was a National Enquirer or The Onion story!
My initial reaction before reading the whole story was the General must have been dating someone in violation of the rules against fraternization. If that had been the case, I would have agreed with the administrative action -- possibly even thought he got off light.
But, in fact, he was dating a civlian, who was totally unaffiliated with the Department of Defense! Furthermore, he was legally separated from his wife at the time!
I swear this is a new low and we were just discussing the outrageous punishment for those Navy pilots. But, this is absolutely puritanical! You cannot demote an officer and force him to retire simply because he dated while separated legally from his wife. This is just too much!
What in the hell has gone wrong with my military!!!
Ken