'It's Obvious, We Have A Spelling Problem Here..'

[Panther_99FS]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2577/3825783687_630cb76dc7_b.jpg

[Chacha]

Unoccupied

Schedualed FOR

Demolishing

:icon_lol: :icon_lol:

at least unoccupied is spelled right and for

[sandar]

Presumably the number is spelt correctly!

[luckydog]

Despite the spelling.....
I kinda like the picture.
Don't know why......
Simplicity?
Pattern?
Coldness.....
Windowshades ????

[sandar]

With out my specs on this morning, I read demolishing as delousing.

[PRB]

<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><title></title><meta name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 3.1 (Win32)"><style type="text/css"> <!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --> </style> Obviously a military building of some sort. Why put a sign on the door that proclaims, with bold certainty, that the building is UNOCCUPIED, and that it's scheduled to be “demolishioned”, at some exact moment in time in the future. If that was the old personnel building, and I'm visiting to see where they sent my last pay check, I don't really care if they think it's UNOCCUPIED, or what they plan to do with it. All I need to know is where the new personnel building is. Did they put that sign on it so that the supply division won't move in and take over the place? And why no “WARNING!!! Stay Away From This Building Because it has ASBESTOS SIDING” sign? I would think that would be important too...

[Jagdflieger]

Ah yes, the classic military barracks building from the 40s and the 50s. Used for everything from lodging to office buildings. I hope they keep one standing as a museum somewhere.

If that's a recent photo, and I assume that it is, it looks like they missed their proclaimed demolition date by a few months too. By the way, contractors like to bid on their demolition as the wood used in them is superior to anything they can get today. Stories abound of contractors finding old rifles and other items hidden in them.

[Railrunner130]

Last place I saw buildings like those was at Lackland.

[Panther_99FS]

Last place I saw buildings like those was at Lackland.

I'm TDY at Lackland :wavey:

[waco]

I think they mean to demolish it twice. And hence require duplicate bids from each contractor.

[tigisfat]

Panther, you posted this a long time ago.

[Cazzie]

Mebbe dey gonna blow it up twice! :icon_lol:

Caz

[Panther_99FS]

Panther, you posted this a long time ago.

Whoops! :redface: