PDA

View Full Version : Needed: native Zero



dswo
December 9th, 2009, 05:11
I know, there are lots of "needs." But this seems like a standout.

gajit
December 9th, 2009, 05:13
Agreed :ernae:

Snuffy
December 9th, 2009, 05:30
Or for that matter, any number of other Japanese ww2 aircraft ... :applause:

Tim-HH
December 9th, 2009, 05:51
Yes, indeed! A native FSX Zero would be great! It still saddens me that A2A was not able to update their FS9 Zero as it's one of my favorite airplanes.

Greetings
Tim

MudMarine
December 9th, 2009, 05:54
It would be nice to see! My F6F, F4U and P-38 need something to shoot at!!:engel016::icon_lol:

peter12213
December 9th, 2009, 06:39
I use the A2A zero in fsx without any problems its a nice flyer too with a great VC!

oakfloor
December 9th, 2009, 08:19
What a classic warbird, why no one has made a quality FSX version is beyond me. :salute:

rayhere48
December 9th, 2009, 08:27
Kinda on topic, but does any one know if there is a WWII japanese aircraft carrier that works in FSX. :salute:

deimos256
December 9th, 2009, 10:10
I would buy a nicely done zero. I would really like to see a Ki-61 but hey we can all dream.

empeck
December 9th, 2009, 10:28
I'd love to see Aichi D3A and Nakajima Ki-84...

Naismith
December 9th, 2009, 11:27
What about a STUKA. There has never yet been a truly great one for the civilian sim.

Henry
December 9th, 2009, 12:00
What about a STUKA. There has never yet been a truly great one for the civilian sim.
i would like one also
H

Ferry_vO
December 9th, 2009, 12:02
What about a STUKA. There has never yet been a truly great one for the civilian sim.

Wolfi has done a very nice one for Fs9 and CFS2, check the SOH library. (Make sure you get Errafiti's paints for it as well!)

Back OT: Yes, a Zero for FsX (A2A/FR quality) would be a good addition!

Roger
December 9th, 2009, 13:02
The WWII Fighters version does ok as a port over...

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/rogera/wwiizero-1.jpg

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/rogera/wwiizero-2.jpg

foreigndevil
December 10th, 2009, 00:54
Roger, the kanji (Chinese characters in Japanese) numbers are mirrored! Don't know if they are in the FS9 version, too?

Lewis-A2A
December 10th, 2009, 01:02
thats a repaint foreign devil that changes the cockpit.

foreigndevil
December 10th, 2009, 05:34
thats a repaint foreign devil that changes the cockpit.
Must be. I'm sure A2A would have done their homework and got it right ... :icon_lol:

vstudios
December 10th, 2009, 12:46
funny you should request such aircraft, I'm a personal lover of the Japanese aircraft but the team I have say 'Dont do it' :salute:

dswo
December 10th, 2009, 13:06
the team I have say 'Dont do it' :salute:

Because there aren't enough potential buyers? It's a serious question, and I'm not making light of it.

ijay
December 10th, 2009, 13:21
Like Roger says the port over works fine in FSX and looks great.

MudMarine
December 10th, 2009, 14:03
What about a STUKA. There has never yet been a truly great one for the civilian sim.

Someone is working on one........can't remember who? Any help anyone?

Roger
December 10th, 2009, 14:19
Roger, the kanji (Chinese characters in Japanese) numbers are mirrored! Don't know if they are in the FS9 version, too?
Well I've unmirrored them...hope this is satisfactory.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/rogera/wwiizero-3.jpg

vstudios
December 10th, 2009, 14:41
Because there aren't enough potential buyers? It's a serious question, and I'm not making light of it.

Exactly, although I want to build one for myself :D

RCAF_Gunner
December 10th, 2009, 18:40
Because there aren't enough potential buyers? It's a serious question, and I'm not making light of it.

I would buy a nice FSX native Zero (or Oscar) too.

I never purchased the full A2A fighter pack way back when and have only picked up their models as the full FSX updates became available. If A2A isn't going to update theirs then hopefully one of our other talented design groups will fill the void.

Piglet
December 10th, 2009, 18:43
On my short list is a C6N1 Saiun "Myrt" Always loved the advanced, clean airframe. Showed just how advanced Japanese industry really was.
It was the only purposed-designed carrier based recon plane built in WW-II. Although no carriers were left when the C6N1 entered service.

Pips
December 10th, 2009, 19:31
Exactly, although I want to build one for myself :D

I reckon your team is wrong. Take a poll, you might be surprised!!

Tim, I sure hope you get around to the C6N soon. It's a beautiful aircraft. And with a max range of just over 3,000 miles (with external fuel) it's an aircraft that can literally go anywhere! :)

foreigndevil
December 10th, 2009, 23:33
Well I've unmirrored them...hope this is satisfactory.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/rogera/wwiizero-3.jpg
They're fine now!:salute:

Lewis-A2A
December 11th, 2009, 05:00
I'd also like to do one, will have to be from scratch, well sort of. But The plate is full for the time being, theres gravy leakin gover the side! :monkies:

crashaz
December 11th, 2009, 08:22
The Zero would be a great seller! Take a poll.... might also get some more simmers into FSX too... someone builds a FSX Zero... I will give them the carrier to package it with!

empeck
December 11th, 2009, 11:09
My favourite japanese carrier!

:ernae:

crashaz
December 11th, 2009, 11:51
My favourite japanese carrier!

:ernae:


Hehehe I have all of Pearl Harbor Strike Force carriers and Hiei and Kirishima.


They will get moved into FSX once I finish off PHP2.

Quicksand
December 11th, 2009, 12:18
For what it's worth, I would, line up, camp out, or anything else it takes to see a native Zero take flight... The only problem with that is that I can't model or repaint, so here I stand with plastic in hand...:kilroy::mixedsmi:

crashaz
December 11th, 2009, 12:54
The modeling is the easy part... the cockpit ouch. Then having to tag all the items and then getting the FSX materials right.

Phew... yeah I would jump up and down for an FSX Acceleration A6M2 in authentic Imperial Japanese Navy colors!:jump:

empeck
December 11th, 2009, 13:12
Modelling and VC are easy part... the xml coding and FM ouch. :kilroy: