Activity Stream - SOH Forum
Contribute Now
Goal amount for this year: 10000 USD, Received: 5,595.00 USD (56%)
Welcome Back, Unregistered     Today's Date:       Current Time: 

Please Support the SOH "2021 Charter Membership Drive"

Accepted Payment Types

Activity Stream

Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles Blog Blogs
  • expat's Avatar
    Today, 02:50
    expat replied to a thread Ju-52 in Prepar3D
    Previously not thinking this was my thing, I downloaded the Ju-52 and just compeleted a flight in P3D4 from Dubindorf to Locarno through the Alps. It's a wonderful model!!
    30 replies | 3277 view(s)
  • expat's Avatar
    Today, 02:49
    Having enjoyed and regarded highly the CS C-130, 727, 707 and 777 (briefly before switching to P3D) in years' past, I have given up on CS in frustration. Taking forever to convert the 707 and 727 to 64 bit, and their pricing policy of charging full freight for P3D if you bought the FSX model (the only work required is converting some gauges - I have dozens of FSX models that work in P3D perferctly with no alterations necessary) when others, e.g., Carenado, offer P3D versions for free if you bought the FSX version. Also, the pricing is way off market. USD 135 (RRP) for a 767 or 777? Really?
    3 replies | 216 view(s)
  • Javis's Avatar
    Today, 02:14
    Good to know, Dean, thanks ! Maybe not a warbird as such but it's deffinately 'militairy'.. :smile: Said it purely because of your "get myself a bit better established in the new sim" remark. An old biplane with just a few gauges seems a good start, don't you think ? I stuck to that idiom myself when changing my FS9 hangar to FSX with your Stearman's little cousine: NAF N3N Yellow Peril. Now wheeled it in my new MSFS hanger. Certainly a tougher place with all this new equippement and machinery.. :eek:
    26 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Javis's Avatar
    Today, 01:56
    yesss... we're getting older, papa... It's on your facebook, Baz. :wink:
    26 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Daube's Avatar
    Today, 01:56
    While I'm not really interested in that Klemm, I just wanted to say I'm more than happy to see Classic Hangar coming to MSFS ! I'm missing my FW-190 so much ! So I hope your learning/training phase won't last too long (and will be successful ;) ).
    7 replies | 189 view(s)
  • leuen's Avatar
    Today, 01:46
    Yes, I have it too. Here over the Lake of Hourtin, where it flew for the first time. But due to engine problems it couldn't participate at Schneider Cup, even if it was developed for this particular purpose. Bernard
    25 replies | 863 view(s)
  • Sopwith Chameleon's Avatar
    Today, 01:40
    OK - it's the Aero-Boero 210 from Argentina ...
    22587 replies | 3780297 view(s)
  • rohan's Avatar
    Today, 01:30
    Brilliant as well as beautiful . . . :encouragement:
    14 replies | 574 view(s)
  • bazzar's Avatar
    Today, 00:50
    Sorry Dean, I can't agree. I truly do not believe that the sim "behaves" normally at all. Example, just for sh##s and giggles I configured a V12 Merin to output 32hp at 48 inches of mercury and dropped it into our Spit. I was able to take off at 40mph and kept climbing at 2000fpm. Some motor! In 21 years of developing I have never come across so many inexplicable variables. And, as is evidenced by a large number of long-time developers yet to release, neither have a lot of people. I tend to listen to people like Roy Holmes who have extraordinary skills and experience. Ask him what he thinks of the flight model.
    26 replies | 566 view(s)
  • DC1973's Avatar
    Today, 00:21
    I almost forgot, I'm also doing the P-47 Thunderbolt, for those big round and noisy fans! I don't really class my Stearman as a "warbird" so I didn't think to include it, but that's also well on the way to release. :adoration: The sim seems to behave normally at Mach 2, honestly I don't know why they tried to stop us achieving it before, and breaking that barrier, when I actually looked into it, was very easy. There are some other tweaks required to ensure systems stay in line at high-Mach, but generally it all seems to be A-okay. I'm assuming Asobo must have some other reason for holding back developers from supersonic aircraft.
    26 replies | 566 view(s)
  • jankees's Avatar
    Yesterday, 23:16
    And if not, I'm sure we can arrange something
    7 replies | 189 view(s)
  • manfredc3's Avatar
    Yesterday, 22:17
    Glad to hear. We'll keep our fingers crossed for you (my toes would not cooperate :biggrin-new:), that you can now enjoy FS2020, with it's limitations, lol.
    24 replies | 733 view(s)
  • AussieMan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 22:16
    ​Looking forward to this one as it is the aeroplane I had my first ever plane ride in back in 1949. Just hoping VH-UUR is one of the regos included.
    7 replies | 189 view(s)
  • bazzar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 22:10
    "doing" mach numbers isn't the real issue. It's how everything else behaves at those indicated speeds that is.:engel016:
    26 replies | 566 view(s)
  • bazzar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 22:07
    Oh, actually, I had forgotten about that one...:engel016:
    26 replies | 566 view(s)
  • 65olschool's Avatar
    Yesterday, 21:25
    Very nice thanks for sharing
    4 replies | 329 view(s)
  • GO_Navy's Avatar
    Yesterday, 21:12
    GO_Navy replied to a thread Legacy Aircraft in MSFS (FS2020)
    Without knowing the specifics, I suggest you: 1) Ensure you have the main aircraft folder (the one all other aircraft panel/textures are aliased to) transferred over first. 2) During the transfer and with the V.25 LI open, you EXTRACT PANEL GAUGES RESOURCES 3) EXTRACT BULK EXTRACT GAUGES RESOURCES 4) TOGGLE ALL AND IMPORT PANEL GAUGES That should work. I deleted mine from community folder and redid the transfer and it works perfectly everytime.
    391 replies | 34029 view(s)
  • Ravenna's Avatar
    Yesterday, 20:42
    Thanks Shessi. Love those spats!:encouragement:
    6 replies | 174 view(s)
  • Javis's Avatar
    Yesterday, 20:41
    IMHO It looks even better than the F. But that might be me.. Always liked jet trainer versions better than the single seaters. Besides you have someone to talk to upthere. Makes no difference regarding repaints, does it ? Every AF that flew them also used the TF. You bet! :cool:
    6 replies | 311 view(s)
  • stovall's Avatar
    Yesterday, 20:34
    Thanks, I will look there as well. Having the image above could allow me to remake the nose art from scratch as close as possible.
    6 replies | 204 view(s)
More Activity